Showing posts with label crime.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crime.. Show all posts

Thursday, July 30, 2009


LOCAL ISSUES-WINNIPEG:
IT'S A MATTER OF DEFINITION:
I've often suspected that there was some "cooking the books" involved in the reported CrimeStats provided by the Winnipeg City Police and dutifully reported by the local media. The decreases in some categories of crime have seemed to be too good to be true. If one were to extrapolate from what has been published one would hazard a guess that in 5 years the city police would have little else to do besides hunt down all those vicious jaywalkers and those who spit on the street. The reality is something different than the picture portrayed by the CrimeStats.




There are many ways of lying with statistics. Perhaps the most common way for such projects as CrimeStats is to change definitions in midstream. This can work both ways. Not only can numbers be erased by removing certain acts from the definitions of incident (to make the police look good). Should there be sufficient political pressure and the promise of increased funding other categories can be artificially inflated. The issue of "street gangs" which is in the news recently here in Winnipeg would be an easy target. How many kids are in "street gangs" depends upon your definition of such, and by manipulating the definition you can easily produce a number 10 times higher than the previous one (and, of course, show success in subsequent years-after the money has been doled out- by gradually shrinking the definition).




Here is one example from the Winnipeg Copwatch site of how one category of crime, sexual assault, has had its definition altered. There is also a link to a petition to change the definition back to the previous one where when the victim knows the attacker it is still considered sexual assault. It's an interesting and actually troubling way for stats to be cooked.

LILILILILILILI
CrimeStat no longer recognizes sexual assault where the attacker is known to the victim:
The M.s. Citizenship Feminist Collective is encouraging people to sign a petition to return the definition of sexual assault on the police’s CrimeStat service to one that includes attacks where the perpetrator is known to the victim.

“As of January 1 2008, Winnipeg Police Services’ CrimeStat service changed the definition of sexual assault to ‘an offence that combines the components of assault with circumstances of a sexual nature where the suspect is not known to the victim’ (emphasis added) from the definition based on the Criminal Code which includes sexual assaults where the suspect is known or unknown to the victim. Over 78% of assault in Winnipeg is perpetrated by a suspect known to the victim (Statistic found in ‘Mean Streets?’ Comak, Chopyk and Wood, p.7). This definition change is not in line with Crimestat’s stated principles of disseminating accurate information and promoting transparency and accountability. Winnipeg is the only Canadian city which reports on sexual assaults in this way (As reported by Gabrielle Giroday in the article “ Board wants police website to report all sexual assaults” in the Winnipeg Free Press, May 29, 2009).

We believe that finding holistic and effective solutions to domestic and sexual abuse begins with being given accurate information.
LILILILILILILI
THE PETITION:
Please go to the Winnipeg CopWatch site to add your name to the following petition.
LILILILILILILI
We the undersigned, demand that Crimestat and Winnipeg Police Services restore the original definition to include those sexual assaults perpetrated by someone known to the victim. We believe that finding holistic and effective solutions to domestic and sexual abuse begins with being given accurate information.

Sunday, February 01, 2009


INTERNATIONAL ANARCHIST MOVEMENT-RUSSIA:
IN MEMORY OF STANISLAV MARKELOV:
The following tribute was recently published in the English language section of the Russian anarchist news site Avtonom. On January 19 Markelov and Russian anarchist and reporter for the Novaya Gazeta Anastasiya Baburova were gunned down by "persons unknown" in Moscow. You can see a tribute to at the Porkupine Blog. The case has become widely known, and the two people are deeply mourned. Here is the Avtonom article on Markelov. The following has been slightly edited for reasons of English grammar.
........................
Stanislav Markelov and the anarchists:
Stanislav Markelov, shot in Moscow by an assassin 19th of January 2009, was not an anarchist. He defined himself as a "Martovian social-democrat", after Yuliy Martov, leader of the pre-revolutionary Menshevik fraction of the social-democrat movement. In more contemporary terms, he was a left-wing social democrat.




But Stas had friends in just about any fraction of the Russian socialists, reformers and revolutionaries. He had an encyclopedic knowledge of the history of the revolutionary movement of Russia, which was a huge inspiration for him, and he could lecture for hours on groups such as the nihilists or narodniks anytime. Stas was interested in the history of the political Red Cross (which still today remains as the Anarchist Black Cross), and he considered lawyers who defended narodniks in tsarist times his precedents. Eventually he became first lawyer to defend left-wing "terrorists", accused by the new Russian state. In all the cases he did during the 1990's and early years of this decade, he managed to dismiss the terrorist charges and eventually if defendants got sentenced, they got sentenced for lesser charges.




Stas was too young to join underground hippie movement ("Systema") of the Soviet time, but his first ideas (and early hairstyle) came from there. Already ,when a young student in the early 1990's, Stas became an activist of the social-democratic party (which always was rather marginal in Russian politics), in its left wing. Probably the first time anarchists came in contact with him was at the time of Yeltsin's coup of 1993 - practically all anarchists and socialists considered Yeltsin's unconstitutional presidential order number 1400 a Pinochetist coup, and were ready to rally against it. (wrong choice, as the author later admits-Molly)Anarchists and social-democrats, Stas among them, drafted a proposition for the Supreme Soviet, which included refusal of support from the national-patriots, withdrawal from Moscow to regions supporting the Supreme Soviet and an economic blockade of Moscow. But as we know, history went otherwise - the Supreme Soviet rejected the proposal, chose the support of national-patriots instead and stayed in Moscow, where it lacked mass support, and eventually defenders of the Supreme Soviet got massacred by Yeltsin's gang. The official death toll is 199 (including 12 of police and army), but defenders have also presented an up to 10 times bigger estimate on the number of victims. (Interesting we never heard this part of the story in the mass media here in the West-Molly)




When it became clear for anarchists and socialists that there was no way of picking a side in the conflict, they decided to organise an impartial street medic brigade instead. The brigade was named after Maksimilian Voloshin, a famous humanist and poet who during Russian civil war remained impartial and defended organised humanitarian aid for civilians. There are some stories of the work of the brigade available in English, for example "Under fire between the Lines" (http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/eastern/yeltsin_93.html) and a translation from Avtonom-journal, "Unhappy anniversary" (http://www.ainfos.ca/03/oct/ainfos00366.html). Participation in this street medic brigade was a real "baptism of fire" for its members but also very frustrating, as eventually untrained volunteers had to help people with bullet wounds. But people who were there, stuck together ever since.




Stas and many others of them became core of the historical club in Memorial, and through the same connections Stas become involved in the anarchist "Thursday Circle", which was later named after the anarchist activist Nikolai Muravin, who was central in organising it and died accidentally in 1996. You can see the results of the work of the Memorial's Club at the site "Russian socialists and anarchists after October 1917" in http://socialist.memo.ru/, which is probably the biggest website on the history of repressions against anarchists (and not only), but unfortunately it is only available in Russian.




Stas also participated to work of the "Free Labor Commune of Pryamukhino", which was was active in the second part of the 1990's. It was a common project of anarchists and the offspring of the Bakunin family to repair the garden of the mansion in Pryamukhino of Tver region, where the famous revolutionary was born and spent his childhood. The Pryamukhino mansion even now has an oak tree planted in the 1820's by Decembrist rebels. Thus the place is linked to 200 years of Russian revolutionary history. It was in the Pryamukhino camps where Stas became friends with Igor Podshivalov, who in 1982 co-founded in Irkutsk the first anarchist group which survived to Perestroika, and became one of the core groups of the KAS, Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists. KAS became a mass organisation during Perestroika but did not survive the crisis of the 90's, except in some Siberian cities where it still lives in form of the SKT, the Siberian Confederation of Labor. Podshivalov died tragically in an accident in August 2006, and Stas co-organised memorial events for him.




However Stas joined also camps more in the front line of struggle than the peaceful labor in Pryamukhino. He participated in the Rainbow Keeper protest camp of 1996 in Volgodonsk, against construction of the Nuclear Power plant of Rostov region. This camp had some heavy confrontation; soldiers from the local army base were ordered to evict the camp and shoot tents, making them full of holes. Legal support for victims of the excesses of the authorities against the Volgodonsk camps of 1996 and 1997 was one of the first times Stas used his profession to support activists.




Stas was also one of the organisers of the 1998 anti-nuclear march in Belarus, and he also joined the Rainbow Keeper protest camp against the harmful local plant in Sasovo of Ryazan region last summer. In the photo above Stas is speaking to a mass protest meeting of Sasovo inhabitants; the flag behind him is flag of the Rainbow Keepers. Stas was also a frequent guest in the annual Chernobyl Day marches in Minsk, which are currently the biggest anti-nuclear demonstrations in Europe (although few years back when there were not yet nuclear construction plans in Belarus, these marches were more social than ecological, defending the rights of Chernobyl victims).




Stas gave active legal and other support to the Belarusian democratic movement since the violent anti-Lukashenko protests of the mid-90's where Russian anarchists joined in as well, and he was fluent in the half-repressed Belarusian language, a very unusual skill for a Russian. His wife was a Belarusian, and they had two young children.




Stas was involved in wide spectrum of activities, but he became famous as a lawyer. From early on, he took cases which no-one else was willing to take, and always picked up a hard, political tactic of defense. Eventually he become Russia's number one celebrity human rights lawyer, a common guest on TV talk shows on most various topics, to argue against Russia's WTO membership for example.




Two perhaps more important cases were both connected with war in Chechnya, but Stas became interested on the problems of Caucasus long before. Already in 1994 he traveled to the area ravaged by ethnic conflict between Ossetians and Ingushetians with Memorial activists. One of his companions from that trip, Alexander Cherkasov, also wrote an excellent obituary of Stas which is available in English at http://chtodelat.wordpress.com/2009/01/20/stanislav-markelov-on-the-frontlines/




There are also other good materials at the site http://chtodelat.wordpress.com/, and also a fragment of a speech Stas did in a demonstration against attacks on political activists on the30th of November 2008. Stas was speaking there, because he was defending the legal interests of a owner of a local paper in the Khimki region of Moscow Region Mikhail Beketov, who was heavily beaten due to his opposition to the construction of a local expressway which would destroy a park, defended by a popular movement. Beketov was found in his garden in a coma the next day after a heavy beating in November. He survived but had several of his fingers amputated and still, 2 months after the attack, is in hospital in a bad condition.




Eventually Stas was defending the interests of family victims of the two most notorious Russian war criminals - Colonel Budanov, who in March 2000 kidnapped and raped a 18-year old Chechen girl (and did many other atrocities, for which he was never punished). Eventually Budanov was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but was released recently having done 8.5 years. Stas was appealing against the early release, and the day he was shot he was returning from a press conference, where he announced his intention to question the release of Budanov in European courts. Thus it is entirely possible, that supporters of Budanov, who is considered as a hero by many in Russia, were behind the murder - but Stas had plenty of other enemies as well.




Another important case was case of Sergey "Kadet" Lapin, who together with other officers of the Hanty-Mansiysk OMON organised a torture and murder factory in the Chechen capital of Grozniy. Eventually "Kadet" was sentenced to 9 years of jail "for exceeding official authority and causing grave bodily injury with aggravating circumstances". Although only fraction of his deeds made it to court and all other suspects went underground or avoided charges altogether, it was still an unprecedented court result.




But this work by Stas is widely published by the liberal mainstream media, so we don't go have to go more into more detail. If you want to have a short summary of the many high-profile human rights cases Stas picked up, you may read the list he published himself at his website: http://ruleoflaw.ru/eng/index.phpoption=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=26




No matter how famous Stas became, he was always ready to do even the smallest cases for anarchists and other radicals, even if the cases were not political. He did not work for free, but he always understood if we had problems in paying on time - he never required any guarantees. The work of Stas defending radicals was such an annoyance for the authorities, that during an NRA investigation police put him out of the game by giving him witness status, so he could not be an advocate. The NRA was an armed group in the 90's, an offshoot of Rainbow Keepers and anarchist scene mixed with some young Stalinists. They committed arson attacks and bombings against military call-up centers, a yellow trade union, police and eventually they bombed the FSB (x-KGB) premises in center of Moscow. 2 former Rainbow Keepers got prison sentences for the actions of the group.




He was a vegetarian, and also the most important lawyer for the Russian animal rights movement - he was a lawyer of the people suspected of stealing rats from a breeder during a demonstration in the Moscow region in August of 2007. He was also doing some work for animal rights "inside the system", reviewing the law “On the protection of animals”. He was also representing the legal interests of local ecologists in Black Sea rim, who got harassed by authorities after some arson attacks against the Sochi Winter Olympics development.




Stas was also defending Pasha Delidon, an anarchist who was sentenced to 4.5 years after an attempt to collect wages his former boss owned him. He was also the most important lawyer of the anti-fascist movement in Russia, defending anti-fascists both when they were victims and also when they were suspected to be perpetrators. He defended the interests of the family of Alexander Ryukhin, murdered in Moscow by Nazis in April 2006, and he was also the lawyer for Aleksey "Shkobar" Olesinov, who is now in Butyrka prison - officially due to nonpolitical charges, but really because he is suspected by authorities of being "a leader" of the radical Antifa in Moscow.




All in all, this is just a brief account of the work of Stas. And I did not even touched the topic of his sense of humor and endless jokes. That was his way to cope with many dangers and threats he faced; he laughed at them in their faces.




Everyone has a story of Stas, many of them. I was not in the European social forum in Malmö, but I laughed so much when I was told how Stas travelled.




There was some banquet at city Mayor's office for the moderate side of the forum participators. Stas was of course there in his fine suit - VIP guests and free booze was definitely a choice for Russia's number one celebrity human rights advocate. Stas saw that a demonstration passed by the office, and friends of Stas in the demonstration could see him waving a hand from the Mayor's office.




After a while, enough of the free booze and Stas decided he would like to see some action. He went to catch the demo, but a riot had already started. With some other Russians, Stas tried to exit by a side street closed by riot police. Stas was already quite drunk and had not quite figured out that coppers were not in a talking mood. So Stas went to Sweden to get beaten up by Swedish riot cops, as if there were not any angry riot cops more closer to his home in Moscow!




So many stories of Stas, who could gather all of them?
S2W
More on the topic:

Anastasia "Skat" Baburova, 30.11.1983-19.01.2009

Our friend and comrade Skat was murdered today in Moscow, shot in the head by an assassin.


Stanislav Markelov Has Been Murdered

The collective at “(The) Movement” (dvizh.org) has issued the following statement:


Stanislav Markelov: On the Frontlines


Lawyer Stanislav MARKELOV,

President of the Rule of Law Institute, biography:


Moscow Antifa Honor the Memory of Stas and Nastya



(in Russian: Акция памяти жертв политических убийств в СПб (фотографии)

Actions to commemorate Stas and Nastya around Russia


These Shards Are Our Tears


Speech by Stanislav Markelov. Moscow, November 30, 2008

Address by Stanislav Markelov. Rally against Political Terror. Moscow, November 30, 2008. Video and text.


Stanislav Markelov: Two Worlds, Two Deaths


Russia: The assassination of Stanislav Markelov By Tom Rollings, marxist.com

.........................
You can read more about Stanislav Markelov on the Wikipedia site about him. Here also is a report from today's International Herald Tribune about a memorial vigil held for him in Moscow.
.........................
Activists in Moscow mourn 2 colleagues:
By Ellen Barry
MOSCOW: The mourners who gathered in a Moscow square, hopping and shivering against the bitter cold, grew still on Sunday as the angry voice of the human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov echoed over a public address system.

"I am tired of meeting my acquaintances in crime reports," Markelov, 34, said in a speech recorded last November.

"We need protection from fascists, from the mafia, from those security services that simply serve them," he said. "We understand well that no one but ourselves will offer us protection. Not God, not the czar, no one. There is no one left but ourselves."

Two weeks have passed since Markelov and a reporter, Anastasiya Baburova, 25, were gunned down by a masked man in broad daylight a few blocks from the Kremlin. Neither had the international celebrity of Anna Politkovskaya, the reporter who was shot and killed in her stairwell in 2006, but they were fixtures in opposition circles, and about 300 friends eulogized them Sunday with ragged grief and anger.

President Dmitri Medvedev made his first comment on the killings last Thursday, holding a candid hour-long meeting with the editor in chief of Novaya Gazeta, the independent newspaper where Baburova worked.

The gesture came as a surprise, since Novaya Gazeta is one of the Kremlin's harshest critics, and left many wondering whether Medvedev was signaling a liberal departure from the policies of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who was president before Medvedev.

That question held little interest for the crowd of about 200 friends and political activists who gathered Sunday, chanting "No to political murders!" Aleksandr Grigoriev, 23, an activist from an anarchist organization, said he knew eight people who had been killed for their political activities.

"I blame the authorities for these killings, not because they failed to protect us, or because they carried out the killings," said Anna Karetnikova, a leader of the Anti-War Club. "I blame the regime because it is impossible to establish civil society here. The death of each person creates a gap in the ranks of civil society. The authorities have made it so that it is profitable to kill."

Markelov was one of a handful of Russian lawyers to consistently defend underdogs in politically charged justice cases. He had just announced plans to fight the release of Yuri Budanov, a Russian tank commander imprisoned for murdering a young Chechen woman.

He had also defended Mikhail Beketov, editor in chief of a regional newspaper, Khimkinskaya Pravda, against defamation charges.

Beketov - who had been crusading against a government plan to clear a forest - was brutally beaten in November and remains in a coma.

Markelov's death has stripped him of his most important defender, said Yevgeniya Chirikova, leader of the Movement to Protect the Khimki Forest.

"Who but Stas could protect him?" she said. "We cannot think of anyone."

As Markelov left the news conference on Jan. 19, Baburova was walking beside him. A native of the Crimean city of Sevastopol, Baburova moved to Moscow to study human rights law but had switched to a journalism program.

She had interviewed Markelov for an investigation of right-wing youth movements, and some have theorized that she was shot because she tried to protect him.

Photographs of Baburova, grinning ebulliently, were propped up in the snow Sunday.

Blogging on LiveJournal, a popular Internet forum, in 2007 as she was preparing to leave Sevastopol, she confided her restlessness and ambition: "I want to go to Amsterdam-Tibet-Paris-wherever," she wrote. "Touch everything - see it - do whatever. I also want to go to Kiev."

In an interview with Moskovsky Komsomolets immediately after her death, her father, Eduard Baburov, described Anastasiya as a stubbornly independent person who competed at chess and martial arts and "categorically refused to accept any help from us." She never confided her troubles, he said, until the very end.

"A week ago she wrote me a strange letter, which alarmed us," he said. "It was short: 'Comrade parents, love me, please!' At that moment our hearts skipped a beat."

Saturday, December 06, 2008


HISTORY:
NINETEEN YEARS AGO TODAY- THE ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE MASSACRE:

On December 6, 1989 the largest mass murder in Canadian history was committed by one Marc Lepine at the École Polytechnique in Montréal. The final toll was 14 dead, all of them women, and 14 others wounded. For full details of the event and the controversies that surround it see the wikipedia article on what happened. In sum Lepine was the son of a French Canadian woman and an immigrant who later deserted his family, but not before laying a full set of beatings on young Marc. As he grew up and experienced failure after failure Lepine searched for someone or something to lay the blame on for his personal failings. He settled on "feminism" and "feminists".
To say this was off the wall is a great understatement. He had been rejected in an application to join the Canadian Army in the winter of 1980-81 because he was "anti-social". His sex had little to do with it. This sort of preemptive "psycho-discharge" meant that he could not even be trusted to kill the people that someone else told him to kill and was highly likely to turn his gun on his own side. His academic career was undistinguished, to say the least, but in his mind he was able to blame feminism for his failure. The idea that he was also considerably less able than most males simply couldn't be entertained in his mind.
Like most events of this nature everybody ended up having a dog in the fight. The events were fodder for calls for further gun control, for banning violence in the media, for liberals and social democrats decrying poverty, for conservatives decrying the breakdown of traditional morality, for advocates of social work saying that it pointed to the need for more head shrinking, for feminists saying it was the inevitable outcome of a culture of violence against women. The latter probably had the most validity, but in a way that its advocates hardly ever stated directly. Quite simply Lepine was your average accident waiting to happen. He was definitely not an elected representative of all men carrying out an attack on women, even if he thought he was in his twisted mind. Lepine was actually an orthodox follower of the idea of "collective guilt" that all too many feminists held, and hold today. This idea is hardly restricted to feminism. It is pervasive amongst the "left" and even the right. It has been described elsewhere as "the culture of resentment". If you want you can take left wing screeds, change the words denoting the villains and voila!! you have a resentful screed from the sort of neo-conservatives who publish in outfits such as Sun Media. You can work in the opposite direction as well.
Where does this go wrong ? Few outside of the steadily decreasing strongholds of religious fundamentalism doubt today that the general goals of feminism are laudable and necessary. The problem comes with abstract thinking. It is all too easy to take abstract categories and do a mental calculus with them that is totally divorced from the real world. Far too many feminist have done this in the past. No...all men are not rapists. No...all men are not violent to women. The problem comes when you surrender to the temptation to make an ideology out of practical problems rather than finding solutions to said problems.
The problem of violence against women is a real problem that calls for real solutions. Eugene Plawiuk over at the La Revue Gauche has laid out a list of what this problem means in his post on the significance of this day. The day has also become the occasion for an annual 'National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women' in Canada. There is still much to do on this matter. What should be avoided, however, is turning this necessary struggle into the occasion for ideological rhetoric and cult building. To do this is to imitate the murderer, to build a monument to Marc Lepine and his sick way of thinking, not to the victims of his crime.

Friday, October 24, 2008


INTERNATIONAL ANARCHIST MOVEMENT-RUSSIA:
ANTI-FASCIST ACTIVIST MURDERED IN MOSCOW:
The following story is from the 'The Other Russia' website, a news service for the opposition in the increasingly authoritarian Russian state. As the story makes plain there is a growing neo-fascist movement in Russia that the authorities are quite tolerant of.
.........................

Anti-fascist Activist Killed in Moscow:
A young activist involved with a Russian anti-fascist movement has been killed in the country’s capital, the Interfax news agency reports (RUS). 26-year-old Fedor Filatov died in an area hospital on October 10th from multiple knife wounds sustained early that morning.

A representative of the Antifa movement said Filatov, known in the movement as “Nok,” was jumped by a group of assailants near him home as he went to work. “According to our information, four to eight people armed with knives were waiting for him in his courtyard,” he said.

The source said that a Russian neo-nazi group had already claimed responsibility for the murder on an internet forum as recently as October 12th. While a murder investigation has been launched, law enforcement officials had yet to verify that information.

The Antifa source said the movement considers Filatov’s murder a “planned action” by extremists. “There is not a shadow of a doubt that he died for his beliefs,” the group’s members wrote in a statement.

Russia has seen a growing presence of neo-nazi and extreme nationalist organizations in recent years, and attacks on immigrants and non-ethnically Russian people have become more common. Immigrant community leaders have meanwhile accused authorities and law enforcement of being too lenient in pursuing ethnically motivated crimes.

Groups like Antifa have stepped in to try to counter the growing influence of neo-nazis and denounce their racist and violent activities. Filatov himself helped to found the Moscow Trojan Skinheads, a group described as “a community of anti-political, anti-racist skinheads from Moscow and the Moscow Oblast.”

Filatov was not the first anti-fascist activist to be attacked and killed in recent years.

In November 2005, vocal activist and musician Timur Kacharava, 20, died from knife wounds in St. Petersburg. In April 2006, 19-year-old Alexander Ryukhin was killed by six neo-nazis outside a punk-rock concert. In January 2007, Ivan Yelin was stabbed 20 times by unidentified attackers on the outskirts of St. Petersburg. In March of this year, 16-year-old Alexei Krylov died in Moscow after a group of 15 neo-nazis armed with knives attacked 7 young people near the Kitai Gorod metro station.

Each young man had taken part in the Russian anti-fascist movement.

Watch “From Russia With Hate,” a short documentary on neo-nazism in Russia, from Current-TV.

Saturday, September 27, 2008


CANADIAN POLITICS:
HARPER AND CRIME (OR IS THAT REDUNDANT ?):
Every election time each and every party in whatever election it may be has to make the obligatory noises about "crime". The simple fact is that the largest influence on the usual "street crime" is simple demographics, something far beyond the control of any bromides of either the right or the left. There is, however, another type of crime, what might be termed "wholesale crime" as opposed to the usual petty "retail crime". it is also known as "white collar crime, and right wing parties, in any country, have their own particularly tolerant view of such things. this is true of Canada and our Beloved Dear Comrade Leader Sneaky Stevie as well. Here's an item from the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) about the federal Conservatives and such crime.
................................

Harper soft on white collar crime:
Stephen Harper has no problem cracking down on 14 year-olds. But white collar crime? That’s another story.
Stephen Harper has no problem sentencing 14 year-olds to life in prison. As for his gang of merry corporate supporters who have fleeced hardworking Canadians for billions? They have a better chance of getting locked up in the U.S.
It’s not that Canada is devoid of white collar crime – Canadian workers and taxpayers have paid a high price for made-in-Canada market fraud and abuse. It’s just that our politicians would rather enable corporate criminals than hold them accountable.
In the U.S., the FBI is pursuing 28 criminal cases against high-ranked corporate executives involved in the great Wall Street swindle that resulted in a financial market meltdown.
In stark contrast, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty congratulated Canadian courts on their decision to protect financial executives from prosecution for their part in the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) fraud in Canada.
White collar crime tends to fly under the radar in Canada. Admittedly, it’s harder to spot than a spray painted mailbox. And our politicians—who bray on about transparency and accountability—work hard to keep it behind closed doors.
In the US, there is open public debate about the Bush administration’s proposed $700 billion bailout package, and even Republican politicians have agreed to restrictions on CEO pay and tighter financial market regulation.
But in Canada, where governments and public entities hold $19 billion of the rotten ABCP investments, taxpayers and workers' pension funds will end up bailing out the financial industry $5 to $9 billion. And for Canadians, there’s no debate. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty didn’t even respond to CUPE’s demand that he appoint someone to represent the public interest in these proceedings.
Compared to Canada, the U.S. is actually tougher on its financial industry, and isn’t afraid to put white collar criminals in jail. In fact, Canadians have to rely on the U.S. to prosecute our corporate criminals, including Nortel executives and Conrad Black.
In the past five years, there have been more than 1,200 successful convictions of white collar criminals in the States, including many Canadians. In Canada, there have only been three.(!!!!-Molly)
Consistent with his neo-conservative ideology of privatization and deregulation, Harper wants greater “self-regulation” of Canada’s financial industry. Harper unveiled a plan in his 2007 budget to adopt “principles-based” regulation of the securities and financial industry. The problem is, business “principles” are, by nature, about making money – not about looking out for the welfare of the public.
Self-regulation opens the floodgates to more fraud on Bay Street, and renders volatile the pensions and investments that Canadians work hard to build, day by day.
So what’s the difference between white-collar criminals and young offenders? Money, power, and voting age. If teens have to be accountable to Harper’s tough-on-crime agenda, then our corporate criminals should be, too. White collar crime has real victims, and leaves behind damaged lives and dashed dreams. We need a leader who puts the needs of the public above the needs of multi-millionaire fraudsters. But Stephen Harper just wants to protect them from justice – and put more kids in jail.