Friday, June 06, 2008


CANADIAN LABOUR:
BUZZ STRIKES OUT:
Today's meeting of CAW officials with executives of the General Motors corporation in Detroit came out snake-eyes for Canadian auto workers. The meeting listed 90 minutes, and was "tense" according to Hargrove. Management, however, refused to back down one inch, and the CAW's Hargrove said that he would consider his options- a strike, arbitration or labour board complaint. Significantly absent was the possibility of the sort of plant occupations that have won Canadian workers workers victories in the past few years. The president of the union local involved, however, has said that the blockade of the GM headquarters in Oshawa will continue in light of the decision. Here's the story of the meeting as recently published in the Montreal Gazette (from the Windsor Star).
.....................................

Union to continue fight to save Oshawa plant
DETROIT - Canadian Auto Workers president Buzz Hargrove said Friday he would continue fighting to save union jobs after General Motors Corp. refused to reverse a decision to close its Oshawa, Ont., truck plant in September 2009.

Emerging from a 90-minute meeting GM chief executive Rick Wagoner- which he described as "tense" - Hargrove said he was "incredibly disappointed" that GM won't honour a bargaining commitment made less than three weeks ago.

"We made a helluva case but they had their minds made up before the meeting and they weren't interested in changing," he said.


CAW president Buzz Hargrove: 'We made a helluva case but they had their minds made up before the meeting.'


GM spokesman Stew Low said the closure decision was prompted by a "fundamental shift away from large trucks and SUVs to cars which we believe is not cyclical and can't be reversed.

"There just isn't the market anymore and we see no reason to keep building vehicles that consumers don't want."

Ron Carlyle, a member of CAW Local 222 which represents workers at the plant, said: "It's a sickening feeling to realize that the company has ripped the heart and soul out of the collective bargaining process."

Carlyle also said a blockade by union members of GM's Canadian headquarters in Oshawa would continue.

Local 222 president Chris Buckley, speaking later to union members outside the GM building, said the vigil will go on until the company agrees to keep the truck plant open.

"They want their building back. They're not getting their building back," he said.

Before Friday's meeting, Hargrove said that nothing short of a reversal by General Motors of its decision to close the Oshawa truck plant would satisfy his members.

GM announced Tuesday that the plant would close in the third quarter of 2009 because of slumping truck sales, throwing 2,600 workers out of their jobs. Hargrove vowed the CAW would fight the closure, which he called a "betrayal" of the collective bargaining process.

During recently completed bargaining, Hargrove said, GM committed to keeping the plant open until the new labour agreement expired in 2011, to continue building hybrid versions of two pickup trucks in Oshawa and to making a new investment in 2011 that would launch the next generation of half-ton trucks.

While the agreement contained a clause addressing market conditions, Hargrove said that GM sold the same number of trucks in May that it sold in April, and added there had been no change in the market in two weeks.

"Someone (at GM) had to have known what was going on. You don't make a decision to close four plants in two weeks," he said.

On Wednesday, GM workers blocked access to GM's Canadian headquarters in Oshawa.
Following discussions between the company and the CAW, GM agreed to Friday's meeting.
Last month, GM announced it would close its Windsor transmission plant, resulting in the loss of 1,200 jobs.

The company and union recently reached a closure agreement for transmission plant workers calling for, among other things, retirement payouts of between $75,000 and $100,000.

INTERNATIONAL LABOUR:
COKE WORKERS ORGANIZE WORLDWIDE:
While it is hardly on the "cutting edge" of transnational capitalism the Coca-Cola corporation remains one of the largest business empires in the world, with a presence across the globe. Unions representing workers in the Coca-Cola empire have seen a need to coordinate their efforts globally as well. The following is an announcement from the IUF about the formation of the 'Global Coca-Cola Workers' Alliance'.
....................................
Coca-Cola Workers launch Global Union Alliance
The IUF's 2nd Global Coca-Cola Unions Meeting took place on May 22 and 23, 2008 following five years of IUF Coca-Cola organizing around the world since the first meeting in 2003. This 2nd meeting was hosted and largely resourced by the German food workers union, the NGG and opened by NGG president Franz-Josef Möllenberg..
The Alliance launch
At this meeting representatives of over one hundred trade unions with members in Coca-Cola in 32 countries launched the Global Coca-Cola Workers Alliance. A Steering Group of representatives form all region would lead the Alliance between full Global Alliance meetings and an Alliance "Contact Group" would maintain the twice-yearly meetings with The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) first negotiated and started in 2005.
The Alliance "pledge"
The Global Alliance of Coca-Cola Unions will be open to all IUF affiliates with actual or potential membership in the Coca-Cola system and commits Alliance member unions to support each other in case of conflicts and in efforts to grow membership and raise workers conditions throughout the Coca-Cola system.
The Challenge
Alliance members pointed to ongoing issues that needed strong and constant pressure from the IUF and its affiliates and allies. These included concerns at the growing use of precarious workers in place of permanent workers, divergence between the practice of some local managements and bottlers and the proclaimed corporate human rights policies of TCCC and the slow progress towards a global agreement with the Company which would commit the Coca-Cola system to rights and most importantly to access by Coca-Coal workers to those rights.
Exchanges with TCCC Director for Global Workplace Rights
At a "Question & Answer" session with TCCC Director for Global Workplace Rights, Ed Potter, most issues raised related to employment security and the widespread use of outsourcing and agency work in the system. There was agreement that this issue would feature centrally in the next direct meeting between TCCC and the IUF team of affiliates in Atlanta in October 2008.
Despite a robust Q&A session during the meeting the vast majority of IUF affiliates acknowledged the positive approach of TCCC in recent years towards wider engagement with trade unions and particularly the Company's willingness to engage meaningfully at the global level in stark contrast to many other US corporations and market competitors.
Moving forward!
At the close of the meeting representatives unanimously voiced a strong sense that the meeting had moved unions representing Coca-Cola workers forward and that the Alliance would provide a platform to build still stronger global union organization within the Coca-Cola system. IUF general secretary, Ron Oswald, commented, "This IUF Alliance is in the hands of our members and represents our best collective chance to exert pressure and positive influence on this complex global corporate system. Coke will continue to engage with us and we will see progress, but progress built both on our engagement with Coke and, probably principally, on our growing organized strength within the entire system - there will be challenging times ahead for Coke workers and this Alliance can represent our best chance to overcome and move forward."

CANADIAN LABOUR:
CAW BLOCKADE OF GM HEADQUARTERS ENTERS THIRD DAY:
As Molly writes this this morning the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) blockade of the General Motors head office in Oshawa Ontario has entered its third day. Union leader, Buzz Hargrove, has entered into talks in Detroit with the executives of GM about the situation. Buzz, however, may be past his best-before date as he limps through his last year as head of the CAW. His recent performances as leader have been less than stellar as he seems more interested in cozying up to management rather than defending the rights of his membership. A pattern of poor contracts and blaming the government and the economy rather than management has been pretty consistent for him in the last few years. While he was "cautiously optimistic" in a statement to the press before entering into the talks this morning we will see what the day will bring. For a rank and file view of the United Auto Workers, the American equivalent of the CAW, see Future of the Union and Soldiers of Solidarity. While these organizations are based in the USA they often carry news about the Canadian situation.
Here is a report from the Oshawa area ie the Durham Region News about the situation as of yesterday.
....................................

GM head office blockade continues

Read the 22 page online special report: The Truck Stops Here

OSHAWA -- The blockade continues on Colonel Sam Drive in front of the GM head office in Oshawa.

About 50 GM workers have held their position since Wednesday morning to protest plans by the company to shut down the truck plant in Oshawa and eliminate up to 2,600 jobs.

The Canadian Auto Workers union says it will not back down until the company meets face-to-face with the union to explain the decision.

A meeting has been scheduled for 8 a.m. Friday in Detroit. CAW president Buzz Hargrove and Local 222 president Chris Buckley will be among the union leaders to meet with General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner.

Federal Liberal finance critic John McCallum, MP (Markham-Unionville), was expected to show his support for the workers at a news conference scheduled for 10 a.m. at the protest line.

The Liberals have criticized Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty for comments that they say discouraged companies from investing in Ontario.

The protest has not affected production on the assembly line, and workers are being told by the union to report for their regular shifts.

GM, the country's biggest automaker, stunned the union and thousands of workers on Tuesday by announcing plans to close the 43-year-old truck plant in the second half of 2009.

New Democratic Party leader Howard Hampton, who also wore a red shirt, joined the workers yesterday.

At the demonstration, GM worker Sherry Fallis said she won't know what to do if the truck plant closes. She lost her job at a plant that supplied GM four years ago, leaving her fearful about supporting her four-year-old son.

Describing her final days at ACSYS Technologies, she told the Toronto Star, "We were hanging onto hope."

Ms. Fallis and about 1,200 other employees transferred to GM, and she thought she had a permanent position.

"It's happening all over again. I don't know what we're going to do," she said.

This time around, Fallis, 32, has a second young son to support. And her husband works at another nearby feeder plant that builds seats for GM's trucks. He'll probably be losing his job too, she said.

Other workers at the demonstration face similar difficulties.

"It's a little scary, what's going on right now," said Tim Lepine, 27. Having little seniority after just six years at GM, Mr. Lepine knows he would be one of the first in line to lose his job in 2009. In the meantime, he said, he will try to save whatever money he can.

"It's pretty bleak, what's going to happen in the future," said GM car-plant employee Jesse Forbes, chair of the union's youth committee.

It represents members under 31, and most will probably be out of work if the plant closes, he said.

"They've just gotten married and had kids and got their house, and they realize how hard it's going to be if their jobs disappear."

Thursday, June 05, 2008


SPAIN:
THE CGT ON "WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY":
World Environment Day was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in 1972, and since 1987 the day is hosted by a selected city on June 5th each year, and an environmental theme is chosen for the day. While rich in commendable sentiments the celebrations take it for granted that the goals of environmentalism are compatible with both "business as usual" and with "government as usual".
In Spain the CGT, the largest anarchosyndicalist union in the world, has released a statement via their paper Rojo Y Negro. The article denounces the hypocrisy of these celebrations in the light of the way the world is actually organized today. The following is translated from the original Spanish at Royo Y Negro. A Spanish reprint appeared at the A-Infos site, but it was considerably mangled in the transmission.
...................................

June 5 : World Environment Day???
Today society and its institutions celebrate World Environment Day with huge events , while promoting uncontrolled consumerism and waste of natural resources.
S. Social Action CGT
Today the world and the corporations celebrate World Environment day with joy and sumptuous feasts while hunger and death and speak at forums and summits
As for the CGT on the World Environment Day we want to denounce the hypocrisy of so much celebration in the hard face of thieves and pirates, celebrants of degradation and theft.
Today citizens of the planet celebrate the offense to the natural environment, the expansion of GM crops, the emergence in the global food markets as a commodity for speculative business.
Today citizens of the planet denounce control of the environment by large transnationals, uninterested in the real demands of the world , deforestation and degradation of ecosystem diversity, the harassment of indigenous communities, the guarantors of coherent life forms.
Today as citizens of the planet, on World Environment Day, we demand the right to dignity in a healthy environment.

CANADIAN POLITICS:
CANADIANS HOLD NEGATIVE VIEWS ON GOVERNMENT:
I guess that one might file this one under the "there's hope yet" title. The following is a recent (May 9 and 10) poll by the Angus Reid organization where respondents were asked to choose up to six words to describe three different recent federal governments. What Molly found particularly interesting is that the highest score of any positive word was only 25% for Harper and his "efficiency". Words with negative connotations had far higher scores for all three governments. It should be noted that this poll was taken before the more recent scandals such as the Bernier affair that have been nipping at sneaky Stevie's heels in the past few weeks. One hopes that such realistic attitudes persist, and that more people may come to see the futility of replacing one set of bastards with another. But you gotta love the title.
.......................................
Canadians Hold Negative Views on Government
May 31, 2008
Abstract: (Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Many adults in Canada appear disappointment with the traits of their current federal administration, according to a poll by Angus Reid Strategies. 51 per cent of respondents believe the government headed by Stephen Harper is arrogant, and 50 per cent deem it secretive.

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Many adults in Canada appear disappointment with the traits of their current federal administration, according to a poll by Angus Reid Strategies. 51 per cent of respondents believe the government headed by Stephen Harper is arrogant, and 50 per cent deem it secretive.

In addition, 44 per cent of respondents believe the current administration is out of touch with Canadians, and 35 per cent regard it as uncaring.

Canadians renewed the House of Commons in January 2006. The Conservative party—led by Stephen Harper—received 36.3 per cent of the vote, and secured 124 seats in the 308-member lower house. Harper leads a minority administration after more than 12 years of government by the Liberal party.

Liberal leader Jean Chrétien acted as Canada’s prime minister from November 1993 to December 2003, winning three majority mandates. 51 per cent of respondents deem Chrétien’s administration as arrogant, 45 per cent call it dishonest, 37 per cent say it was out of touch with Canadians, and 36 per cent regard it as secretive.

Paul Martin took over as prime minister from Chrétien in December 2003, and formed a minority administration after the June 2004 federal election, where the Liberals received 36.7 per cent of the vote, and secured 135 seats in the House of Commons. 50 per cent of respondents believe Martin’s government was ineffective, 43 per cent think it was out of touch with Canadians, 40 per cent consider it was arrogant, and 37 per cent claim it was dishonest.

In 2005, the Canadian government and the Liberal party were affected by the public inquiry into the federal sponsorship program initiated during Chrétien’s tenure to promote Canada in Quebec. In February 2004, auditor-general Sheila Fraser concluded that approximately $75 million U.S. of the program’s budget was paid to Liberal-friendly advertising firms for little or no work. The inquiry report exonerated Martin—who acted as finance minister during Chrétien’s tenure—from "any blame for carelessness or misconduct."

Earlier this year, Ronald Lamothe—the assistant chief investigator in the office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections—alleged in an affidavit that the Conservatives contravened federal election laws by funnelling money in and out of the campaigns of local Tory candidates. According to Lamothe, the manoeuvre allowed the Conservatives to spend $1.1 million above their legal limit in media advertising during the 2006 federal election.

Polling Data
Here are some words people may use to describe a government. Please select up to six words you think describe the federal government headed by:
a) Stephen Harper since February 2006. b) Paul Martin from December 2003 to February 2006 c) Jean Chrétien from November 1993 to December 2003


1)Arrogant
51% Harper
40% Martin
51% Chretien

2)Secretive
50% Harper
32% Martin
36% Chretien

3)Out of touch with Canadians
44% Harper
43% Martin
37% Chretien

4)Uncaring
35% Harper
27% Martin
27% Chretien

5)Ineffective
34% Harper
50% Martin
31% Chretien

6)Dishonest
29% Harper
37% Martin
45% Chretien

7)Efficient
24% Harper
9% Martin
20% Chretien

7)In touch with Canadians
19% Harper
11% Martin
19% Chretien

8)Sincere
18% Harper
13% Martin
13% Chretien

9)Down to earth
17% Harper
11% Martin
16% Chretien

10)Shame
15% Harper
22% Martin
24% Chretien

11)Open
14% Harper
9% Martin
11% Chretien

12)Pride
14% Harper
11% Martin
21% Chretien

13)Compassionate
10% Harper
9% Martin
13% Chretien

Source: Angus Reid Strategies Methodology: Online interviews with 1,001 Canadian adults, conducted on May 9 and May 10, 2008. Margin of error is 3.1 per cent.

Other poll highlights:
Satisfaction with the federal government’s performance: Maintaining security and public order 54%, Handling the national economy 46%, Ensuring equality of opportunity 38%, Informing Canadians about its policies and plans 34% 34% believe the Canadian media is biased against the Conservatives 27% believe the federal government is entitled to control media access to specific briefings
Complete Poll (PDF)

CANADIAN POLITICS:
CUPE THROWS SUPPORT TO INSITE VIGIL:
As Molly has reported previously on this blog there will be a vigil on Parliament Hill today to pressure the federal government to keep 'Insite', Vancouver's safe injection site open. The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) has thrown their support to this vigil. Here is their statement.
.......................................

CUPE urges feds to leave InSite alone
CUPE supports demonstrators holding a vigil on Parliament Hill June 5 to ask the federal government to support InSite, a Vancouver safe injection and addiction treatment program.
What:
InSite Supporters Host Vigil on Parliament Hill to recognize lives saved at Vancouver's Supervised Injection Site.
When:
3pm, Thursday, June 5, 2008
Where:
Parliament Hill, meet at Peace Flame.
InSite supporters got a boost from the BC Supreme Court May 28, when a judge struck down portions of the criminal code that would have forced the site to close its doors.

InSite had been granted a temporary exemption from Canada's drug laws, but the exemption was due to expire June 30 and the Harper government had no plans to renew it.

But the program, which provides drug addicts clean needles a safe place to inject and options for rehabilitation and treatment, is still in jeopardy.

The federal government is expected to appeal the BC Supreme Court ruling, which gave the government 60 days to bring Canada's drug laws in line.

"It's a simple fact that if InSite closes, people will die," said CUPE National President Paul Moist. "The Harper government needs to understand that and get behind InSite and similar harm reduction programs."

"We support efforts at harm reduction like InSite because we think addiction is an illness and people with that illness need our help, not our blame," he said.
1375 St. Laurent OTTAWA, Ontario K1G 0Z7
Ph: (613) 237-1590
Fax: (613) 237-5508


OAXACA MEXICO:

TRAVELS IN OAXACA:

The following is reprinted from the A-Infos website. it's the description of the situation in the Mexican state of Oaxaca by Ramor Ryan, an Irish exile presently resident in Oaxaca.

................................

Mexico, Oaxaca, A Day In the Life of a Simmering City
Midnight in Oaxaca, and walking around the historic center, it's almost as if nothing had ever happened here. The bourgeoisie sit around under the colonial arches in the long stretch of French-style outdoor cafes lining the central plaza. Aside from being beset by a small army of ambulant trinket vendors and beggars, the well-heeled citizens sipping cappuccinos seem very at ease with the world. A few late night tourists wander about the pleasant old streets under the starry sky, and the industrious hum of the sultry cosmopolitan city invokes an eternal calm.
----- It's as if there had never been a riotous peoples' insurrection in these same streets just two years ago. As if the rebel citizenry had never erected one thousand and one barricades to defend their city from the marauding police forces of the despised and despotic state government.And as if the tens of thousands of rebels and insurrectionists had not been this close to winning the great battle for Oaxaca in the heady summer days and nights at the barricades of 2006. The famous subversive graffiti that painted the whole town red and black is removed, whitewashed, as is the blood in the streets of the 26 fallen comrades shot down by the police and state paramilitaries.
“Since all of this, we will not be the same at all as before; we can’t be and we don’t want to be,” said a resident shortly after the quelled uprising.
But at this moment, to a visitor just having stepped off the bus from Chiapas, the strange normality of the place gives the appearance that everything has not changed, that everything remains the same in Oaxaca as it was before the uprising.
Sometimes hope comes from the most unexpected quarters. Walking away from the sanitized Zocalo, we chance upon a moribund vista. Shuffling around in the half shadows of a street corner, about a hundred tooled-up riot cops loiter with menace -- as if itching for something to happen.
The phalanx of troops, an ominous dark mass of helmets, riot shields and shiny black boots, clank their long metal sticks on the somewhat medieval flagstones. It is an incongruous sight at this time of night,amidst this placid ambiance, without the slightest disturbance to be ascertained of any kind anywhere.
Paradoxically, their presence signifies a welcome sign -- where there are riot police there is generally trouble, and trouble in the Oaxaca context, means ... resistance.
I have followed the movements of police riot squads with close interest for many years. So I approach the last cop in the line -- a young indigenous man clad in state-of-the-art modern armor -- and with all the sweet innocence of a visiting tourist ask him as to why they are here.
"Is there a problem, officer?" I ask.
He tenses up, grips his metal baton and stares at the distant wall, not at me.
“We are here for your protection” he says sternly -- and somewhat comically.
We have heard that one before. Back in the day, during the war in Ireland, this is how the occupying British troops behaved -- nervous,uncertain and trigger-happy. So this is it -- as people had forewarned-- this tremulous peace in the city is one overseen by riot cops lingering in the shadows. Oaxaca is a city under stealthy occupation.
The March of the Umbrellas
Around midday, under the glare of the blazing tropical sun, some 50,000 protesting teachers start flooding into downtown Oaxaca. Today, May 15 is Teachers Day, and the states educators have downed chalk on-mass, and declared a strike as they have done religiously every year for the last 25 years.
It's a remarkable sight, the arrival of the teacher hordes. Teachers anywhere in the world are a most innocuous bunch of people, and the members of this particular branch of the national teachers union, known as Section 22, are the most unlikely street revolutionaries imaginable.Yet these same humble unionists were the solid backbone of the 2006 insurrection. Here they come, this sea of teachers under the midday sun,these revolutionary hordes and ... they are not masked up, nor linking arms, nor pumping fists. No, they are strolling along gaily under a roof of colorful bobbing umbrellas, singing songs and being generally full of revelry and joy. Having marched for 3 hours one would expect a certain fatigue, but no, the teachers are boisterous and upbeat and the enticing chaos is more mad hatters tea party than militant discipline.
"The teachers struggling," they sing, "celebrating their day of the teachers!
"But it would be a mistake to underestimate their militant resolve.Maria, an indigenous Zapotec teacher from the isthmus is carrying her one-year-old child Victoria in her arms as she marches.
"Victoria?," I ask.
Hasta la victoria siempre!” she laughs, towards victory always, quoting Che.
Maria had been part of the uprising in 2006.
“Wow, lots of tear gas and running,” she says, looking back, “but ... we almost made it, we almost won.”
"Do you have fear," I ask, "returning here two years later, to Oaxaca city center, after the brutal repression?"
“Not unless I don't have a stone or a stick in my hand to protect myself, no, then I am not afraid,” she says with a laugh, this 20-something-year-old mother who defines herself as "a Christian teacher".
From the central platform on the kiosk in the Zocalo, the teacher's leaders spell out their demands for higher salaries, increased funding for rural schools and the resignation of the state governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz.
“We won't negotiate with the government of Ulises,” says Domingo Cabera,secretary general of the Section 22 of the Teachers Union, “because we don't recognize the legitimacy of his government, we will only negotiate with the federal government.”
“Here today with this massive turnout,” says the speaker, “we demonstrate that the movement is more consolidated than ever.”
Sort of. It's common knowledge that Section 22 of the Teacher Union is in a state of disarray. Maria, the rural teacher, doesn't trust the words or intentions of her union leadership.
“While striking teachers were selling their cars and their houses in 2006 to support the strike, the corrupt leaders were accepting bribes and selling out the grassroots,” she tells me.“It is a tragedy, but now we are re-organizing.”
Flavio Sosa takes the microphone and it is a significant moment.Recently released from jail, he is one of the most recognized figures of the Oaxaca Peoples Popular Assembly (APPO). As the organizing body of the uprising, APPO brought together a myriad of social and political groupings and could mobilize hundreds of thousands at the height of the rebellion. Flavio is of the faction of the APPO state council who favors negotiation with the authorities and political participation in state and municipal elections -- a very contentious issue within the rebel movement.
“We demand the release the remaining political prisoners,” says Flavio over the microphone, outlining the political demands of the movement,“[and] the cancellation of the outstanding arrest warrants (several hundred), punishment for those responsible for the deadly repression committed during 2006 and the resignation of state governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz. Fuera Ulises -- Ulises out!”
Ulises, Ulysses, is a most aptly named tyrant -- whom Virgil refers to famously in the Aeneid, as “a cruel and deceitful man”. The much hated latter-day Ulises minor continues to be the focus of the protesters ire.Representing the PRI party who ruled Mexico for 70 years, he was elected in 2004 under very dubious circumstances, and marked the beginning of his tenure with a campaign of brutal repression against his opponents.While previous Governors had negotiated or tolerated the widespread and deeply ingrained opposition movement in Oaxaca, Ulises oversaw the criminalization of protest. But he underestimated the strength and determination of the opposition, who responded with the total takeover of Oaxaca. Exiled for most of 2006, his administration was only able to return after a bloody offensive by some 6,500 militarized cops against APPO on October 29 of that same year -- leading to 200 arrests, hundreds hospitalized and the city center resembling a battlefield.
A Cantina Full of Anarchists
We -- two Irish visitors -- have come to Oaxaca to talk with the comrades from Oaxacan Voices Constructing Autonomy and Freedom (VOCAL) (switched placement), a sizable anti-authoritarian grouping that forms part of APPO. Anarchists and libertarians had played a prominent role in the defense of the city in 2006, and remain an important voice in the movement. In a traditional cantina, a group of grassroots teachers and Vocal-istas engage in a the post-march analysis.
A big march somewhat empty of content, appears to be the general agreement.
We meet with David Venegas Reyes, a 25-year-old local resident who emerged as one of the more charismatic and articulate young voices on the street in 2006. For his trouble, the state issued an arrest warrant and in April 2007 he was abducted from a city park, and thrown in jail. After a campaign for his release, in which even Amnesty International voiced concern for the manner of his detention, he walked in February2007, all charges dropped.
“On the one hand here in the city,” explains David, “the government has been able to partially dismantle the Section 22 which was the largest of the unions and the center of the movement in 2006. But at the same time there is a lot of discontent in the ranks, and the leadership has been totally discredited by the base. So while the government has managed to corrupt the union leadership by buying them off, the base has become more conscientious and is therefore more difficult to cheat or hoodwink.”
First off, David is not a leader, nor a spokesperson for VOCAL. But it seems by general consensus of the various Vocal-istas here, that he will be the one to talk to us visitors -- maybe because he is the affable and chatty one of the group.
The owner of the cantina overhears the table talk, and voicing support for the teachers and APPO, sends over a round of beers. I am impressed by how open and conspicuous are the activists despite the general atmosphere of repression in the city. Several of the people here have outstanding arrest warrants from 2006 still hanging over their heads,yet this does not stop them going out and joining the protests, or simply going about their lives unbowed.
"What about APO?," I ask. "Is it affected by the same kind of disarray as the Section 22?"
David responds carefully and comprehensively; I think its worth quoting him at length:“APPO has basically being the unity of the different organizations of the peoples of Oaxaca. The interesting thing, the transcendental thing about APPO is that it has managed to bring together a broad representation of the various peoples of the state with a wide convergence of different ideologies and visions of the world -- all under the one assembly. Then came the great wave of actions that took place in 2006, the great advance towards realizing our collective aspirations -- first demanding the exit of Ulises, and much more than that, also demanding a radical and profound change in the society in which we live in .”
“So in 2006 our APPO assemblies reflected the assemblies of the indigenous communities in so much as that there were no leaders and it is the assembly which decides things. We tried to act like this but sadly there was a gap between how we acted in assembly and the verticalism practiced by some of the social organizations. So there was this tension within APPO as how people wanted to organize and how to practice.”
“The spontaneous combative spirit that arose in the streets was not the result of some bureaucratic orders from some leaders up on top; no, they came from the people in the streets themselves, and the spirit remains there.”
“When the brutal repression against us began, the mobilizations weakened, firstly because of fear at the ferocity of the repression. But alongside this, people felt dispirited and demoralized by the opportunistic actions at this critical moment of some of the considered leaders of a few social movements. The important point of this story is that in February 2007, some social movements decided that the movement couldn't achieve the demand of removing Ulises from government and so proposed that APPO make an alliance with the supposed left-wing political parties in Oaxaca and to compete for power in the local municipal and congressional elections. During this discussion, an important group of companeros defined themselves by opposing this proposal and we managed to stop this attempt to institutionalize our movement. And so emerged strong divisions within the movement, provoked mainly by those whose aspirations for taking power were frustrated.”
“So a group of us libertarian companeros and those who didn't believe in political parties and various ideologies, agreed that for the movement to enter into the electoral route was to merely play the states game in this context in Oaxaca and so we opposed it. VOCAL doesn't aspire to become the leadership of APPO. VOCAL is a space of unity for those who think the autonomy of our diverse and multicultural peoples is a political proposal for our reality. We stayed with the APPO because the unity of the people is important. And its important to remain true to the words that were said in 2006 that the APPO is a movement of bases and not of leaders. Although it was said, many did not act like this and began to invest their confidence in false leaders.”
Other voices around the table are more forthright in their criticism of the PRD (opposition political party) and Marxist-type elements which took control of the APPO, but David remains staunchly non-sectarian.
“So there are many of us, not just VOCAL, the Magonistas and some Marxists, but many of the base who believe that we have to re-organize the movement from below, not from the top down. Because the truth is that APPO is in the communities and in the union bases -- not just in the leadership. In Mexico there is a long history of leaders becoming compromised -- anybody who knows a little of the union history knows how often this has happened -- the leadership always becomes compromised, recuperated by power. And the leadership in APPO has similar tendencies.”
"So what are the lessons," I ask, "that have been taken away from 2006?"
"As in, you almost had it, APPO was in control of the city like a modern day Paris Commune and Ulises was on his way out the door; victory was so close. And then after holding the city for eight long, glorious months,came the huge wave of repression and the movement was beaten off the streets. What went wrong," I added.
“There are some who say we made tactical errors in 2006, but I don't think it was an error or mistake to defend our territory in a physical form against the assassins of Ulises and the militarized Federal police of (Presidents) Vincente Fox and Felipe Calderon. For me that was not the error -- to defend ourselves, no, the error that was made was when people started to believe in false leaders," said David.
Another comrade chimes into the discussion. “And there are those who say that the movement brought repression upon themselves by upping the ante of resistance, that they got what they deserved! Nonsense!”
“The prisoners and the dead aren't guilty!” says David. “The guilty are those who imprisoned and murdered them."
It's now late afternoon and everyone disperses for various meetings. The political energy is perceivable and the days' march has got people upbeat. The spirit of resistance is simmering once more in the streets of Oaxaca.
Of Police and Streets
Sometime after dusk, we reunite with David under the portal of the great old central Cathedral in the Zocalo. Despite the days events, the police presence in the center is negligible -- mostly undercover agents discreetly monitoring the proceedings. The authorities have decided upon a non-aggressive strategy and the city is teeming with teachers in repose. It must be surreal for them to be confronted with this veil of normality in the city they once occupied. One noticeable difference from even the night before is the clandestine presence of graffiti all over the place. The ubiquitous APPO slogans and Fuera Ulises! are back on the walls of the city again.
Walking the darkening city thoroughfare, a police car slowly passes by,and David involuntarily glances over his shoulder. I imagine he has his fears -- after all, it was in these very streets that he was suddenly lifted by an undercover snatch squad in broad daylight, and abruptly removed to the nightmare of indefinite incarceration.
“Fear? Yeah,” he says, “of course we have fear. But fear should not impede us from moving forward. People continue to struggle just as they did in 2006 without stepping back, or wobbling. People are coming together again, to make sure that Ulises's assassins or the abductions don't continue."
"I was a prisoner held for 11 months, just a caprice for the authorities. And then I was released for lack of evidence.” he added.
It wasn't that justice was done, more that the pressure from outside meant it was politically untenable for the state to hold him hostage any longer. David recognizes the role national and international solidarity played in his release, and in the struggle in general.
“A really important part in detaining the repression was the level of national and international observation that took place from outside. If this hadn't happened, I think that the repression would have been even much worse.”
“But it shouldn't be thought that suddenly we live in a just state now,”emphasizes David. “We still live under a state of daily repression and harassment. It's unbearable, and we can't have some government telling us that we must accept living under this state of oppression, as if it was some kind of normalcy. We don't accept it, because we are a free people, free we are born and free we were brought up. And since the resistance hasn't stopped, so the repression continues. I think that whatever happens in Oaxaca in the next while it's really important that people from outside don't stop the vigilance, and continue pressurizing the government to limit their use of reactionary violence.”
A new Amnesty International report echoes his concerns, denouncing the repression on the social movement and the general impunity that exists for security forces in the country in general, and the abuse of citizen's rights in Oaxaca in particular.
But this climate of fear engendered by the authorities doesn't stop David traversing these streets which he has known all his life. Indeed,the going is slow as he meets and greets all and sundry along the way --like this middle-aged indigenous man who stops him randomly and wishes him well, knowing of his unjust imprisonment. It's like the movement,even if it doesn't hold the center, still has the street.
We are going to a social center where a bunch of musicians and activists are gathered for a night of Son Jarocho, a traditional popular song anddance. It's an autonomous space, familiar to other cultural and political spaces in different parts of the globe -- self-managed, a shebeing of sorts, where people come and go, and the mood is friendly. Between ardent musical performances, people give brief presentations,like this from a representative of the Universidad de la Tierra (UniTierra), a peoples' university based here in the city. Another is a report back from the caravan of the isthmus region undertaken by a group of VOCAL activists, including David, who returned early this morning.The Trail of the Jaguar political tour of the rural isthmus consolidated links with indigenous communities of the region under the theme “for the regeneration of our collective memory”.
In a quiet moment we drag David away for the gathering and continue with our interrogation. On the flat roof of the social center, the city stretches out far and wide, the lights shimmering across the vast valley. Oaxaca is a much bigger place than it seems when wandering around the historic center.
"What's going on with the movement in the city, and in the countryside,"I ask, "Where do we stand now?"
“Here in the city, there has been a strong militarization and a heavy police presence to repress the movement. Meanwhile the government hassomewhat ignored the indigenous communities and it is there, in the rural community that some very important organizing is happening. I'mnot saying that the movement in the city has finished and now the movement is only in the countryside, no. It is more that the government,while focusing all their attention on defeating the movement in the city, has allowed discontent to flourish in the countryside,” says David.
While of course simultaneously letting the paramilitaries have a free hand to do their dirty work in the communities -- including the April ambush murder of two women journalists working for La Voz que Rompe el Silencio (“The Voice that Breaks the Silence”), a community radio station serving the Trique indigenous community. But the kind of police and military saturation within the City has not occurred in the communities.
“And so today in Oaxaca City there is a tense calm. The councilors and officials of the APPO and Section 22 leadership are being conciliatoryand opportunistic. Groups of Stalinists and PRD-istas of the electoral persuasion are making a pact with the business leaders to get permission to mobilize. But the others, like us in VOCAL and other groups, the majority of the movement, are in constant confrontation with the authorities because our mobilizations are not seen gladly by the state-- and the line between repression and tolerance is barely visible,”says David.
An Oaxaca Commune
The Son Jarocho session is wrapping up and people are homeward bound. Wepile into a van going out to the outskirts of town where a bunch of people are staying. There's about a dozen of us in this beat up van,rattling along the highway out of town. There's a certain spirit of abandonment about these people and it's contagious. I'm thinking if the cops stop this thing, they will net a good dirty dozen desperadoes of veteran anarchists.
The van arrives at a feral warehouse on a sprawling lot, cluttered with machines, tools and a big old bus just back from the Trail of the Jaguar tour. The collective living space is populated by a group of weary and sonambulant activists. A tattered, faded image of the Virgin of the Barricades adorns a wall, the ironic patron saint who presided overthose at the barricades in 2006. Her image, with her iconic gas mask and cloak of burning tires reminds me of Calamidad's words, the last gringa on the last barricade on the last night of the Oaxaca commune.
"A lot of people have been fucked in the head ever since November 25,2006," she lamented, "when it was all lost in a flurry of bullets -- but damn was it a close fight for awhile. In a sense people are just as traumatized by the tragic implications of what victory might have been-- and how close people were to it, so close they could taste it for the first time in their lives -- as they were by the violence. When I returned to Oaxaca, I would walk into a party, and comrades would come up to me and say -- 'she remembers! We almost did it, we had the city! All the barricades! The city was ours!' So its not only the repression that people remember, but also the memory of holding the streets for so long is a bitter one ... because they lost them.
"Here in this chaotic, creative space, among the barricadistas who have not given up, there is a palpable feeling that, despite the loss in 2006, there is still hope and people are now organizing harder than ever.
“And,” David Venegas reminds us, “as the Mexican saying goes -- 'There is no evil that can last a hundred years, and there's no body that can't resist it', meaning that everything has its own time, and this straight-jacket of a state has come to its end. That the time has come.”
Up and down the country people are invoking the centennial memory of the first Mexican revolution -- 1910 -- to herald a new revolution in 2010."What's the feeling here," I ask David, "about this quasi-mystical belief in revolutionary change on a sanctified date?"
“Well many Mexicans are resigned to the fatality of the idea of 2010,”he says with a smile, “and as you know, Mexico is profound and millenarian. But for me, its not important that the deed happens on this very date, but more importantly that it occurs! And I can feel it in the air in Mexico -- a longing for revolution. But revolutions don't just occur on a certain date -- they are prepared. And what I'm seeing is a growing insurgent spirit, alongside an increase in the brutality of the government. There is a great indignation felt by the communities and movements against whom the bad government has declared war.”
“I hope a revolutionary change occurs in this country because there can be no half solutions, reforms are not going to end the injustice and exploitation. A change from the bottom is necessary, a profound and truthful change. This is what millions are demanding, and this is what the government are trying to deny us. The government has failed to reform the state constitutionally, to comply to our aspirations. That is why it is we, the people who must make those changes -- because the government has lost its opportunity. So now its our responsibility to make those changes.”
It's midnight once more in Oaxaca, and this long plenteous day, May 15,2008, is over. We bed down in the loft cosy with about 20 other companeras and companeros and dreams come easily. History is a nightmare from which Oaxaca, like Mexico, is trying to wake up from and maybe 2006 was just a primer.
Ramor Ryan is the author of Clandestines -- The Pirate Journals of an Irish Exile (AK Press 2006). He lives in Chiapas, Mexico.

Wednesday, June 04, 2008


CANADIAN POLITICS:
HARPER'S "WAR ON DRUGS"
The following is a reprint from Straight Goods, an independent leftist online magazine based in Ontario. It is particularly apt given the Conservative response to the recent court decision about the Insite harm reduction site in Vancouver.Consider subscribing.
.........................
Just say no to Harper's war on drugs

by Ish Theilheimer
The Harper government's determination to close Vancouver's safe injection site fits with a larger picture. The Harperites are so determined to be seen as tough that they don't care who gets hurt, whether addicts live or die, or what professionals and scientists have to say. All that matters to them is that voters see them as tough.

This sort of politics infects all of Canada, not just Vancouver's urban core. Twice in three days last week in rural Ontario, I saw local police making exhaustive searches of cars they had pulled over. If you go by the police reports in local papers this sort of thing is becoming common. A lot of people are being charged with possession of drugs after their vehicles have been searched this way.


Since 2006, thousands of people have been charged with a criminal offence that recently was within a whisker of extinction.

There is growing evidence that Canada's cops, empowered by court decisions and the Harper government's get-tough attitude on drugs and crime, are using "routine" traffic stops as excuses to shake down vehicle occupants. It's a safe bet that most of the people getting stopped and shaken down are young, poor, non-white, long-haired, scruffy or otherwise "of interest".

In February 2008, the Ontario Court of Appeal approved the use of evidence obtained through flagrant police misconduct, in this case a large quantity of cocaine seized in a traffic stop near Kirkland Lake, Ontario. The court ruled, according to the Toronto Star, that "any black eye caused to the justice system is outweighed by public interest in prosecuting a serious crime." In the Star article law professor Alan Young was quoted as saying, said "There's no question that this court and other courts are losing interest in the whole enterprise of excluding evidence." Court rulings like this — combined with direct messages from the Prime Minister to get tough on drugs — create an attitude that condones aggressive police tactics. The number of arrests for marijuana possession "rose dramatically in several Canadian cities" in 2006 after the Conservatives took office and killed a bill to decriminalize possession of small amounts of the drug, according to Canadian Press. "As a result, thousands of people were charged with a criminal offence that recently was within a whisker of extinction."

Police are well aware of what the courts and federal government are doing. They appear to be using these new directions to ramp up Canada's moronic answer to a Bush-style "War on Drugs". Bush's war has caused misery for millions, created an explosion in prison population, enriched organized crime and done nothing for the poor young people it is supposed to be helping. Canada needs no part of it.

The opposition party that musters the courage to champion an end to the drug war insanity will be rewarded by thankful voters.

CANADIAN LABOUR:
AUTOWORKERS BLOCKADE GENERAL MOTORS HEADQUARTERS IN OSHAWA:

In the wake of the recent announcement by General Motors that they plan to renege on a collective agreement signed only two weeks ago with the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) that offered substantial concessions on the part of the workers in return for assurances of job security angry workers have blockaded the General Motors headquarters in Oshawa Ontario. In addition to the insulting lie delivered to the autoworkers at the very time when they were planning the closure GM has also reneged on an agreement with the government of Ontario that gave GM almost half a billion dollars in return for a promise to maintain a certain number of jobs in Ontario. The corporate arrogance is overwhelming. Quite frankly they think that they can get away with any crime. Molly will be blogging further on this breaking news in days to come. For now here is the story as transmitted by the business pages of the Globe and Mail.

..........................................
Angry union members blockade GM Canada head office
OSHAWA, Ontario (Reuters)

- Hundreds of angry autoworkers blockaded the entrance to General Motors of Canada's headquarters in Oshawa, Ontario, on Wednesday, demanding the company reverse its decision to close the local truck plant and crying foul over the timing of the closure.


"We're not allowing any GM of Canada employees to enter the headquarters building," said Chris Buckley, of the Canadian Auto Workers union, which says 2,600 jobs will go if the truck plant closes.


"We are going to stay here until General Motors reverses the decision they made yesterday, or at the very least commits to a product for the Oshawa truck plant, or sits down face-to-face with this union to try to explain why they have broken our brand new agreement."


GM said it would meet with the union in Detroit on Friday.


The company announced on Tuesday it would closed the Oshawa plant, and three others in North America, as it tries to shore up a restructuring plan that has been overtaken by a steep decline in U.S. sales of pickup trucks and SUVs in the face of surging gas prices and tight credit.
Two truck plants in the United States and one in Mexico are also slated to close.


Up to 750 people, many clad in red T-shirts emblazoned with a white maple leaf and the words "Made in Canada matters," peacefully blocked the road leading to GM's Canadian headquarters.
"I feel sick about this situation and all I can do is visualize GM workers on the welfare line," said Jim Bedford, a retired GM employee from nearby Bowmanville, Ontario.
BARGAINING FAITH QUESTIONED
The CAW, which has around 13,000 members at GM, says the closure of the Oshawa plant is a betrayal. GM and the CAW signed a new three-year labor agreement on May 15 that included a wage freeze and a promise by GM to boost production in Canada rather than cut it.


Under that deal, GM said it would start producing hybrid versions of two of its trucks at the Oshawa plant.


The plant currently produces the Chevrolet Silverado and the GMC Sierra crew-cab and extended-cab pickup trucks, which GM Canada spokesman Stew Low said are taking the biggest hit of GM's products in the United States.


He said the hybrid versions of the Silverado and Sierra would still be built and rolled out at the end of the year, but at other plants, either in the United States or in Mexico.


Auto analyst Dennis DesRosiers said in a note that the final decision to close the Oshawa plant probably had not yet been made during the bargaining, but the company most likely had an idea of what it wanted to do. (Molly Note: 'Final Decision' means "the actual order to close". This is something quite different from making the plans for such a thing. Given corporate 'speed" I really think that this involves deliberate lieing on the part of management during the negotiations).


"The real reason is that they didn't have to and it would weaken their position in the labor talks ... And why would GM provide (CAW President Buzz Hargrove) this information which would only have strengthened the CAW position and hardened the resolve of the CAW."
U.S. CONSUMERS WANT FUEL ECONOMY
GM's Low said the closure boils down to a rapid shift in customer demand away from larger gas-guzzlers as pump prices surged to record levels.


"Our main customer is the U.S. and there is a huge and very drastic shift away from trucks and SUVs and we have to react to that because we can't continue to buy vehicles that people aren't buying," Low said.


U.S. auto sales figures released on Tuesday showed GM truck sales were down 39 percent in May from a year earlier. Sales of the Silverado were off 44 percent and those of the GMC Sierra down 33.9 percent.


GM's moves to close the four plants, along with shift reductions, will reduce its truck capacity by over 700,000 and total North American capacity to 3.7 million by 2010, which should result in $1 billion in cumulatively savings by 2010, said Mark Warnsman, an auto analyst at Calyon Securities.


GM also operates a car plant in Oshawa that produces the Chevrolet Impala and Camaro and other models.


Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said the federal government is interested in helping GM begin production of a new car at the Oshawa car plant.


He said he was willing to use funds from a C$250 million ($245 million) Automotive Innovation Fund designed to develop more fuel-efficient vehicles.


"We need a third vehicle. I've already spoken with General Motors about that. ... If we can participate in funding that innovation, then we're certainly going to be there," Flaherty told reporters.
© Reuters Limited. All Rights Reserved.

OTTAWA:
ONE MORE DAY UNTIL INSITE PROTEST ON PARLIAMENT HILL:
The following is the latest communiqué from the 'Insite for Community Safety Campaign'. Tomorrow is the day of the rally on Parliament Hill, and Molly hopes that any of her readers from Ottawa will attend.
............................
Please forward this to anyone and everyone in Ottawa, we are really pressed for time and need to get as much support out there as we can!-joey
-----------------
INSITE FOR COMMUNITY SAFETY CAMPAIGN
CALL FOR SUPPORT
WHAT: VIGIL IN SUPPORT OF INSITE
WHERE: PEACE FLAME PARLIAMENT HILL, OTTAWA
WHEN: THURSDAY JUNE 5TH
To Volunteer 2pm set up
Focus time for picket 3:00- 6:00pm
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
With less than a month left in the current extension on the exemption, which allows InSite to operate, now more than ever,our communities must come together in solidarity. We will gather on Thursday in peace on Parliament Hill to put pressure on the Federal Government to demonstrate responsible decision making in policies that effect Canadians deeply.
Recent news declares the BC Supreme Courts reached a decision in favour of Insite, An appeal by the Health Minister, however, is in the works. This appeal is a symbol of the Conservative Government's unwillingness to recognize harm reduction as an effective means to approach drug related issues.
Insite For Community Safety is an initiative of the PHS Community Services Society which co-manages InSite, North America's only Supervised Injection Facility, and whose purpose is to act as an umbrella for individuals and groups across the political spectrum who do not usually work together, but are united now to build a comprehensive, made-in-Canada drug strategy.
Joey Only and Leah Martin, volunteers with the campaign, set out Tuesday May 13th to visit the constituency offices of prominent conservative MP's who hold significant opposition to the science of Insite. Their goal was to reach out to their communities with the message, "before they were "junkies" they were kids".
Join us and many others in making a community statement that harm reduction, of all kinds, was here before the conservative government took their lead, and it will persist into the future! CONTACT INFO:
Nathan Allen (604) 833-0748
Leah Martin (604) 562-6054
(‘Friends of InsiteFacebook)
---SOUND RESISTANCE RADIO & PRODUCTIONS


CZECH REPUBLIC:

HUNGER STRIKES AND OTHER PROTESTS AGAINST US PLANS FOR MISSILE INTERCEPTORS IN EASTERN EUROPE:

Over the past two years the US government, in cooperation with the governments of Poland and the Czech Republic, has moved slowly and inexorably towards the stationing of an anti-missile system in the territories of the two east European countries mentioned. This project has proceeded much more quietly than the Reagan area 'Star Wars' circus- which amounted to nothing substantial-, and the Bush administration has probably been wise to move via stealth rather than rhetorical fireworks in this case. For an overview of the Reagan era 'Star Wars' overhyped project see THIS WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE. Also consult 'National Missile Defense' for an overview of the general subject.



The present plan is that the radar station for the project will be situated in the Czech Republic while the interceptor missiles themselves will be situated in Poland. The location of the installations makes it quite obvious that they are aimed as a threat towards Russia rather than what the US government claims- that they are meant to intercept missiles that might be launched from so-called "rogue states". To date only North Korea has demonstrated both missile and nuclear capacity. The idea that interceptors based in Poland could overtake missiles launched from North Korea eastwards is, of course, ridiculous. Iran presently has neither nuclear capacity nor missile capacity to reach western Europe. Of course the interceptor missiles involved will not be anywhere near as capable as their proponents claim them to be. What they are,however, is a device to "thin" any Russian launch, perhaps even- perish the thought- simply a retaliatory strike against the only state which has both used nuclear weapons in warfare and threatened to use them on many other occasions. Perhaps the missiles that would be launched from Russia wouldn't be aimed at western and central Europe at all but rather at some unnamed "rogue state" that has demonstrated its willingness to both use and, especially, threaten nuclear annihilation numerous times in the past.



But if these installations are built they will automatically become necessary targets. This project hasn't been without opposition in both Poland and the Czech Republic. It is certain that the majority of Czechs oppose the construction of the radar base on their territories, and it is probable that the majority of Poles oppose the location of the interceptor missile on theirs. Presently some of the opposition to this "Star Wars Version 2" has taken the form of a series of hunger strikes carried out by Czech citizens to bring the world's attention to the situation. Ongoing news about these protests can be found at the Europe for Peace website. These hunger strikes are undertaken by humanists who hold to the philosophy of "non-violent direct action". Molly might quibble about whether their self-applied description is indeed "direct action". To my lights it is merely another form of "petitioning", just as pointless riots at economic gatherings are. Neither tactic directly changes the situation. Both merely try and force the hand of established power to comply with ethical demands. Both are protest rather than "direct action", but the tactics of the hunger strikers at least have the advantage of occupying the moral high ground.



In their own words, here is the underlying philosophy of the humanist protesters against the location of tracking radar in the Czech Republic, from The Strength of Non-Violence website.


What is active non-violence?

Non-violence generally refers to some or all of the following: a system of moral concepts that disavows violence; the mass movement led by Mahatma Gandhi in India in the first part of the twentieth century; the struggle for civil rights by African-Americans in the United States under the leadership of Martin Luther King; and the activities carried out by Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana. The activities of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Andrei Sakharov, S. Kovalev, and other famous dissidents opposed to Soviet totalitarianism are often included as well.




The idea of non-violence is expounded in the Bible and the writings of other religions in the exhortation not to kill. This idea has been developed by numerous thinkers and philosophers; Russian authors Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky expressed it in profound formulations. Tolstoy's formula proclaiming the supremacy of love and the “non-use of violence against evil,” or better, the impossibility of fighting one evil with another, found worldwide resonance, inspiring a somewhat singular sect of “Tolstoyists.”




The non-violence movement developed by Gandhi prepared the ground for Great Britain to renounce its supremacy in India, though Gandhi himself was killed by a paid assassin. Also M.L.King's struggle ended without victory. He was assassinated in the balcony of his hotel in Memphis, while assisting a protest which denounced the low salaries of the black people who collected the trash. Nonetheless, the concept of non-violence , including non-violent forms of protest, continues to be a vital, evolving force in the world. Daily mass actions by lower strata of workers, meetings and protest demonstrations, strikes, women's and student movements, farmworker and peasant demonstrations, leaflets, neighborhood newspapers and periodicals, appearances on radio and TV, all these constitute the contemporary forms of the ethic and practice of non-violence.




New Humanism, developed by Silo(Who???-Molly) since the 1960s until today, strives to reduce violence to the greatest extent possible, to create perspectives which go completely beyond violence , and to use all possible methods and forms of bringing resolution to conflicts and dichotomies along the path of creative non-violence.




Non-violence is frequently equated with pacifism , when in reality the latter is neither a method of action nor a style of life but rather a sustained protest against war and the arms race. From the above it follows that non-violence and active non-violence (1) consist of a personal commitment, a style of life and a methodology for social change.




The two pillars of the methodology of active nonviolence are civil disobedience and non-participation.




Civil disobedience has the following ideological and philosophical justification: If the State imposes laws which are violently unjust, discriminatory, etc. and the application of such laws affects people negatively because it transforms people into agents or receivers of injustice or discrimination, then people have the right and the moral obligation to not comply with such laws. Civil disobedience and non-cooperation intentionally break the unjust law and accept the punishments, for example imprisonment, as a dignified consequence of their actions.




Non-participation or vacuum towards violence implies avoiding involvement in violent situations – which usually has a negative economic effect to the transmitter of violence – proclaiming publicly the moral posture of both parties.




In the cases of Gandhi and M.L.King, the interest was in changing unjust laws or social realities, and only when the searched for steps could not be achieved through negotiations and persuasion, direct action with planned activities was used. (Examples of Gandhi, Salt Law and Salt March; Martin Luther King, state laws of racial segregation, bus boycott, sit-ins, marches, etc.).We can see that these predecessors of active non-violence, and many others, were people who also had a strong and vital spiritual and religious feeling. This shows that historical moments of great changes have been accompanied by new feelings of religiosity. They are moments of hope. In such moments a great moral force is put into motion and the human landscape changes.
(1) ACTIVE NON-VIOLENCE: The strategy for struggle of New Humanism, which consists of the systematic denunciation of all the forms of violence exercised by the System. Also, a tactic for struggle applied in specific situations in which discrimination of any type is occurring.








News
Situation in the world
About NMD system


Europe for Peace

There is presently an international online petition, which has so far gathered over 100,000m signatures, against the US plans for this project. The following, from the Europe for Peace site gives the text of the petition and a backgrounder. If you'd like to read more and sign the petition go to the EfP site.
Petition Text:
"I do not agree with the installation of a US military base on Czech Republic territory, as part of their NMD (National Missile Defense) project. The implementation of this project is increasing international tensions, generating a new arms race and is the first step towards the militarization and control of space. Since more than two thirds of the Czech population are against this project, I think it is only fair that the Czech people have the right to decide on such an important question by means of a referendum."
Declaration
The NMD project of the United States – their national missile defense system, is a very complex project which involves the production of new weapons, and the installation of US military bases in different parts of the planet. In particular, in Europe, the first step is the installation of a radar system in the Czech Republic, as well as a base for interceptor missiles in Poland.
This plan has divided Europe, which at the moment is not able to give a united, coherent and nonviolent response to the United States’ aggressive policies. The reaction of Russia and China has created a “cold war” atmosphere. International tensions are increasing, and the crazy arms race (both conventional and nuclear) has restarted. Above all, the bases are being installed to militarize and control space. More than two thirds of the Czech population are against the presence of United States military on Czech territory. Despite this, the Czech and US governments are continuing the negotiations which are, by now, reaching their concluding phase.
The Czech people will declare that any contract that the Czech government may sign with the US Government concerning the project to install US military bases on Czech territory will have no legal value. And so the Czech people will not feel in any way bound to any type of commitment. The formal respect for laws passed in Parliament by a relative majority is not enough to be considered as real democracy. When a Government takes a decision which clearly goes against the will of a majority of its citizens, it is not respecting either the spirit or deepest essence of democracy.
The US government must clearly understand that it is not carrying out a dialogue with the Czech people, but with a minority that does not represent the will of the majority of Czech citizens. For this reason, any agreement will have no legal value. Our American friends must clearly understand that their government’s policies are generating a widespread feeling of “anti Americanism” which was not present before in Czech culture, and in this way, their aggressive policies will only turn against them. We know that a nonviolent action to boycott American products has already begun, and that this phenomenon could quickly spread beyond the boundaries of the Czech Republic.
The majority of Czechs do not want foreign military bases on their territory.
The majority of Czechs want to decide these problems themselves by means of a referendum: a fundamental instrument of any democracy.
Jan Tamáš
Nonviolent Movement against US bases in the Czech Republic
Dana Feminová
Europe For Peace