Tuesday, October 21, 2008

There's an interesting new article in the open publishing Canadian medical journal Open Medicine. The gist of the matter is a massive study on use of medicare in the province of British Columbia, and the conclusion is that, aside from visits to GPs, the lower your income the less service you receive from the medical system but the higher the eventual costs due to emergency in-hospital acre. Hardly astounding, but its nice to see it proved.
The following is the abstract of the article. To read the full article GO TO THIS LINK.
Income-related inequities: Cross-sectional analyses of the use of medicare services in British Columbia in 1992 and 2002:
Kimberlyn M McGrail
Background: The primary demonstration of the principle of income-related equity in Canada is the provision of health care services based on need rather than ability to pay. Despite this principle, Canada, along with other OECD countries, exhibits income-related variations in the use of health care services. This paper extends previous analyses to include surgical day care, assesses changes in income-related equity between 1992 and 2002 in British Columbia and tests the feasibility of using administrative data for general equity analyses.
Methods: Data derive from the BC Linked Health Database and from a custom tabulation of income tax filer data provided by Statistics Canada. Cross-sectional analyses measure inequity in the probability and conditional use of services using concentration indices, which summarize health care services use for individuals ranked by income, after standardization for age, sex, region of residence and need for health care services.
Results: Small but systematic relationships were found between income and use of health care services for all types of services, with the exception of visits to general practitioners (GPs). Lower income is associated with greater conditional use of GPs and greater use of acute inpatient care. Higher income is associated with the greater use of specialist and surgical day care services; the latter inequity was found to grow substantially over time.
Conclusions: Deviations from equity deserve further investigation, especially because the use of day care surgery is continually expanding. For example, an understanding of the reasons for differential admission rates to acute and day surgery might provide insight as to whether community-based services could help shift some acute care use among lower income groups to surgical day care. It is possible to use administrative data to monitor income-related equity, and future research should take advantage of this possibility.

No comments: