CANADIAN POLITICS:
CADMAN AFFAIR DRAMATICALLY CHANGES ELECTION TIMING SCENARIOS:
(FROM THE 'HARPER INDEX'):
Truth time may be coming closer for the Harper government as allegations of criminal vote-buying(or attempts thereof) in reference to the late independent MP Chuck Cadmon. The latest news is that Cadman's widow and daughter are sticking to their story that Cadman revealed the attempt to them, but that at least the widow says that Harper himself assured her that he knew nothing of the offer. This may, of course, depend on one's definition of "nothing". An audiotape that was recently released shows Harper saying that "he didn't know the details". One should certainly hope not. Control freak that he is Harper still has to be credited with the good sense to leave dirty details to his dirty lieutenants.
Molly finds little surprising in all this. One can basically judge political parties by the fact that they usually deliver the exact opposite of the image that they hope to project. Liberals and social democrats promise greater equality and more help for the poor. They deliver increased inequality via state control and waste the money for the poor on social work schemes. Conservatives promise fiscal probity and "morality". They deliver profligate spending and scandals that far exceed those of their opponents. The wheel keeps on turning and returning to its original position.
Anyways here an article from The Harper Index on the implications of this latest scandal for whether we have to suffer through another election soon. Don't forget to subscribe to this fine website....
Cadman affair dramatically changes election timing scenarios
March 17 by-elections likely to go ahead, and Liberals could bring down government this spring if Conservatives sink in polls.
OTTAWA, March 3, 2008: Stephen Harper's hopes to call or force an election have been set back by allegations that the Conservatives attempted to bribe the late MP Chuck Cadman for a crucial confidence vote when Paul Martin was prime minister.
March 17 by-elections likely to go ahead, and Liberals could bring down government this spring if Conservatives sink in polls.
OTTAWA, March 3, 2008: Stephen Harper's hopes to call or force an election have been set back by allegations that the Conservatives attempted to bribe the late MP Chuck Cadman for a crucial confidence vote when Paul Martin was prime minister.
Harper is now caught in a he-says-she-says situation. 'He', in this case, actually involves two top Conservative Party operatives, Tom Flanagan and Doug Finley, both known for their aggressive tactics. 'She' also involves two people: Cadman's widow - a Conservative candidate herself - and his daughter, neither of whom has anything obvious to gain from the charges.
There is also the battle of competing audio tapes: Cadman saying publicly that there had been no financial offers made to him by the Conservatives, and Harper admitting privately that there had been.
If the allegation is proven "it will be almost impossible for Harper to remain in office."
"The Cadman affair dramatically changes the electoral equation," York University political scientist James Laxer told HarperIndex.ca by email. "If it turns out that Stephen Harper actually gave party officials the green light to try to financially induce a dying Member of Parliament to vote to bring down the Martin government in 2005, the Prime Minister's career could be finished. This is one of the most serious allegations to face a Canadian government in decades, and the allegation directly implicates the Prime Minister. If proven, it will be almost impossible for Harper to remain in office."
These developments mark a dramatic reversal for Harper, who had threatened to go to the polls this winter over three different issues - Afghanistan, the budget, and crime legislation. Prior to the Cadman story emerging, the Conservatives probably hoped to be able to call an election before March 17. That's the date of four by-elections. The Liberals are expected to win at least three, including the riding where defeated Liberal leadership candidate Bob Rae is running.
University of Toronto political scientist Nelson Wiseman told HarperIndex.ca the Liberals compromised on those issues in order to get to the by-elections. "One of the things the Liberals have decided is they want the publicity boost from winning in three or four ridings," said Wiseman.
Liberals caught in their own by-election strategy?
"Dion will not pull the plug now," says Laxer. "Indeed, how can he? He's already bought into the Conservative agenda on the two key issues, Afghanistan and the budget. His quibbles aside, the Liberals have signed on to extending Canada's military mission in Kandahar until 2011. And Liberal support for the budget, symbolically stamps the party's seal of approval on a set of economic policies whose hallmark is reduced taxes for the wealthy and the corporations, as well as full steam ahead for oil sands development at the expense of the nation's hard hit manufacturing sector."
Another observer told HarperIndex.ca that Rae, the Liberals' foreign affairs critic and co-chair of Liberals platform development, pushed for the compromises for the sake of the by-election election strategy, and to get himself into the House.
With the change in fortunes, an election will be most likely to occur soon if the opposition forces it. Wiseman told HarperIndex.ca, "I still think there's a chance we will have an election this spring. On an Opposition Day, if the Conservatives were to drop in the polls, one of the opposition parties could introduce an explicit non-confidence motion that was very soft that all parties could support."
Laxer says it is highly unlikely that Harper would dissolve Parliament soon. "Having received the support of the Liberals on Afghanistan and the budget, the government can hardly make a convincing case that opposition obstructionism makes a trip to the polls necessary.
Only a non-confidence vote will force an early election
Under the election act introduced by Stephen Harper, the election date has been fixed at October 19, 2009 unless the government "loses the confidence" of the House. The Cadman Affair makes it more likely that the Liberals - without whose support the NDP and Bloc cannot unseat the government - will finally force such a vote soon.
The downside of an election engineered by the Liberals, says Laxer, is that Stéphane Dion has lost much of his political appeal in the run-up. "When he was chosen leader of the Liberal Party, [he] could make a credible case that progressive Canadians ought to join him (at least, in ridings where the NDP was not competitive) to throw out the Conservatives. Now he hasn't a ghost of a chance of making a credible case to progressives. He's caved on the defining issues and everybody knows it."
Wiseman, who spoke last week with Dion, said, "The Conservatives have co-opted the Liberals." Until Cadman, this had put Stephen Harper in a strong position to campaign on leadership issues, with the Liberals in virtual agreement on key issues.
Now the Harper government could lose control. The by-elections will go ahead, which won't help their cause. Economic problems are looming, and federal surpluses are shrinking, which makes new programs to attract voters unlikely. the Mulroney-Schreiber thing never gets better, and now there's Cadman. To make matters much worse, in November, Americans may elect Barak Obama, and Harper's team has already been accused of meddling to hurt Democratic chances. For all these reasons, it is possible Stephen Harper could create a reason to trigger a non-confidence vote and an election before things get worse.
Related individuals, organizations and significant events
No comments:
Post a Comment