Thursday, June 24, 2010


AMERICAN LABOUR CALIFORNIA:
HELP KEEP METHYL IODIDE OUT OF CALIFORNIA FIELDS:




The following appeal to help keep methyl iodide out of agricultural use in California comes from the United Farm Workers.

MIMIMIMIMIMIMI
Take Action to Keep Methyl Iodide Out of California Fields

Comment period expires in a week on June 29th

California is on the verge of approving a dangerous carcinogenic gas for use on strawberry fields and other food crops. Methyl Iodide is so toxic that scientists in labs use only small amounts and wear special protective equipment. In fact it’s so reliably carcinogenic that it’s used to induce cancer in the lab. It’s a fumigant so there is a constant threat of it drifting to farm workers and rural communities.

Yet the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) is on the verge of approving its use in the fields. They are doing this despite their Independent California Scientific Review Committee (SRC) issuing a final report (PDF), which found (PDF) that "any anticipated scenario for the agricultural…use of this agent would…have a significant adverse impact on the public health."

Last Thursday a Sacramento hearing was convened by the California Senate Food and Agriculture Committee, where members of the panel testified. Dr. John Froines of UCLA who chaired the committee, said, "This is, without question, one of the most toxic chemicals on earth." DPR does not seem to be listening to the scientists they hired.

Please help. If Methyl Iodide use is approved, this toxic poison can be released directly into California’s air. We have to stop this. The DPR is accepting public comments on its proposal through June 28. Please take the time to send an e-mail to the DPR immediately and ask them not to release this toxin into our environment.

There is little to debate about Methyl Iodide’s toxicity. It is a known neurotoxin, disrupts thyroid function, damages developing fetuses, and has caused lung tumors in laboratory animals. California already classifies it as a human carcinogen. Fumigating fields with the gas, even with the strictest regulations, would no doubt still result in unacceptable exposures to farm workers and nearby communities.

We have one last chance to stop Methyl Iodide from being used in our fields. Please submit your comment today and tell DPR that we don’t want to be exposed to this poison.


MIMIMIMIMIMIMI
THE LETTER:
Please go to this link to send the following letter to the California Department of Pesticide Regulation.
MIMIMIMIMIMIMI

I am deeply concerned with the pending approval of Methyl Iodide for use on strawberries and other food crops in California. Methyl Iodide is a known human carcinogen, as well as a neurotoxin and disruptor of thyroid function. It can be especially damaging during fetal development, and it has no business being used as a fumigant in the open atmosphere.

I understand that the DPR has recently completed a study of the chemical. Scientists on the external panel that reviewed the DPR's findings on methyl iodide stated that agricultural use would ,"result in exposures to a large number of the public and thus would have a significant adverse impact on public health." I don’t understand how you can release this dangerous toxin into Californias’s environment, with these findings.

Even the strictest regulations on application will surely not prevent exposure of workers and nearby communities to this hazardous chemical.

Please do not go ahead with your proposed approval of methyl iodide. I ask the DPR to take responsibility and immediately withdraw the recommendation to approve its agricultural use. The public health of all Californians demands no less.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010


HUMOUR:
PLAYING MONOPOLY FOR KEEPS:

INTERNATIONAL LABOUR-PAKISTAN:

COKE WORKERS IN PAKISTAN STRUGGLE FOR A UNION:



Coca-Cola is, not surprisingly, one of the corporate sponsors of this year's World Cup in South Africa. Yet they steadfastly refuse to play fair in their bottling plants across the world. Here's a story and appeal from the international union federation the IUF about the struggle for a real union amongst Coke workers in Pakistan.

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Coca-Cola Pakistan Greets New Union with Death Threats, Abduction, Extortion and Dismissals
Since forming a union at Coca-Cola's bottling plant in the southern Pakistan city of Multan in June 2009, members have met with death threats, abduction, firings, extortion, forgery and fraud. It's been a long wait for rights and recognition - and not exactly refreshing.

In addition to the threats and dismissals, management has manipulated the relevant authorities to stop the legal registration of the union. Workers' social security documents have been massively falsified to “transfer” regular workers to a fictitious labour contractor in order to 'prove' that they don't work for Coca-Cola, and can't join a union of Coca-Cola workers! Management created a yellow union – but even the alleged president of that union testified that he had never attended the founding meeting, was not the president and had never applied for registration!

The Multan plant is part of Coca-Cola Beverages Pakistan Limited (CCBPL), jointly owned by Turkish bottler Coca-Cola Icecek (CCI) and The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) based in Atlanta, which sits atop the global Coca-Cola system.

The Multan workers need your support. Despite all these illegal acts the union officers and their supporters remain steadfast in their determination to win union recognition and become the IUF’s newest members in the Coca-Cola system.
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
THE LETTER:
Please go to this link to send the following message to the Coca Cola company telling them that you support their Pakistani workers.
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC


To Ed Potter, Director Global Labor Relations, The Coca-Cola Company
Hüseyin Akin, President, International Operations CCI
Aliye Alptekin, Human Resources Director CCI
Ronald Jones, President, Middle East & Pakistan Region CCI

Dear Madam/Sirs

I am shocked and outraged to learn that management of your bottling plant in Multan, Pakistan, has committed an escalating series of illegal and criminal actions in an effort to block the establishment of the new union at the plant. According to reliable information these acts have included death threats, abduction, transfers, dismissals and the fraudulent falsification of employment records in a campaign to destroy the union.


These acts are in flagrant violation of international human rights norms and Conventions. I therefore call on you to ensure that: all acts of intimidation against members and supporters of the People's Employees Union at the Multan plant cease immediately; that the company cease its efforts to block the union's legal registration: that managers and other company employees who organized or committed such actions are identified and all those implicated in violence or threats of violence are removed; and that trade union rights are fully respected at the plant.

Yours sincerely,


LOCAL EVENTS WINNIPEG :

ROCKING AT THE ROCKER:

Coming up tomorrow at the Rudolf Rocker Cultural Centre...three great bands.
♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪
brothers w/ right through and cinema l'amour (from montreal)
Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010
Time: 8:00pm - 11:30pm
Location: the rocker! 3rd Floor of 91 Albert Street

Description:

prepare yourself for 2 great winnipeg locals to blow you away with a little help from montreal's own cinema l'amour!

come down early thursday the 24th the doors are at 8 and the first band goes on at 9!!!


http://www.myspace.com/ohhbrothers
http://www.myspace.com/rightthrough
http://www.myspace.com/cinemalamourband

Tuesday, June 22, 2010


CANADIAN POLITICS LONDON:
IS A POSTER "PROPERTY DESTRUCTION" ?:


While the police forces of Ontario and a good part of the rest of Canada are being drained to put on the massive show of force in downtown Toronto (who cares if there are a few more murders and a lot more robberies as long as those 'goddamn protesters' can be intimidated ?)the police in one other southern Ontario city, London Ontario, have been busy doing their little bit to stop the collapse of civilization. That is they were arresting two individuals for the heinous crime of putting up posters opposing the G20 summit in Toronto.


Now Molly knows that London Ontario is hardly unique in this regard. There are moves afoot by one city councillor here in Winnipeg to have postering outlawed, and there are numerous other cities where it is already illegal. This "crime" of course defies enforcement. One can only imagine the outrage if a city has to waste resources on a "poster police" to go around and tear down every single ad for stray cats on power poles and every single garage sale sign on boulevards. Quite frankly whenever I visit a different city I find these unauthorized signs infinitely more interesting than the legally permitted commercial advertising.


Down in London Ontario the anal retentive absurdity is somewhat less as the enforcement is targeted ie enforced against political opponents of the G20, part of the campaign to create paranoia that Canadian governments are obviously engaged in. Some in that city are not going to stand for this persecution. Here's a press release from the Ontario platformist organization Common Cause about what happened and the 'mass postering' response to the ham handed attempt at censorship.
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

June 22, 2010

For Immediate Release:
-----------------------------------------------

LONDON ACTIVISTS TARGET OF POLICE INTIMIDATION

The recent arrests of two London activists for “promoting disturbance” represent yet another dramatic escalation in the Canadian state’s ongoing attempts to criminalize dissent.

We denounce these arrests as the shameful police intimidation tactics they are, and declare our solidarity with the two individuals arrested - including our organization’s youngest member, Andrew Cadotte.

It is clear that politicians and police officers in this country are more than willing to bend the rules to try and intimidate those seeking to challenge the continued domination of the poor by the rich.

By referring to postering as “property destruction”, the police are attempting to build a psychological connection between lawful dissent and violence where no such connection exists.

The police cited the “negative message” of the posters as grounds for holding these individuals overnight in jail. But the true “negative messages” plastered around the city are in the sexist advertisements that promote women as emotionless commodities, and on the countless billboards that sell apathetic consumerism as a way of life.

Public space should belong to the community, not to corporations, and should be a space where we can freely express our ideas as part of the democratic process. This freedom must be regularly exercised and vigorously defended, or else it will be trampled on by the repressive nature of the state.

This is why several of our members joined with the direct action on Thursday, June 17th that covered our city’s downtown core with the very posters our comrades were arrested for putting up two nights earlier.

As anarchists and social justice activists, we have every intention to continue “promoting disturbance” of the capitalist status quo, guided by our undying commitment to international class struggle and, ultimately, revolution.

Common Cause - London

Common Cause is an anarchist organization with branches in London, Hamilton, Toronto and Ottawa.


--
Common Cause
P.O. Box 347, Station E
772 Dovercourt Rd.
Toronto, ON, Canada,
M6H 4E3

Email: commoncauseontario@gmail.com
Web: http://linchpin.ca
Online Forum: http://anarchistblackcat.org/viewforum.php?f=61

CANADIAN POLITICS TORONTO:
LABOUR VERSUS THE G20:



Numerous groups with various agendas are planning to protest at the upcoming G20 summit in Toronto. Some of the protest events have already begun (see G8/20 Toronto Community Mobilization ) Amongst the groups protesting will be a wide number of labour unions. One of the sore points for labour is the planned deployment of the 'sonic cannons' crowd control devices. Here is a press release from the Ontario Federation of Labour speaking of their plans and protesting the deployment of this weaponry. There are a lot of questions surrounding these weapons such as whether they cause permanent hearing damage (probably), whether they can be overcome by simple countermeasures such as garbage can lids reflecting the sound back at the sender, and perhaps most importantly how trigger happy the police will be in trying out their new toys.

G20G20G20G20G20
LARGEST G20 PROTEST PUTS PEOPLE AND THEIR SAFETY FIRST
ORGANIZERS SUPPORT INJUNCTION TO PREVENT USE OF SONIC CANNONS DURING SUMMIT
(TORONTO) -- The organizers of the June 26 “People First!” rally say their reason for organizing what's likely to be the biggest public protest during the G20 Summit was to give ordinary working people a chance to speak out in a place that's safe and free from the overblown security presence that's become so commonplace during meetings of the world's most powerful heads of state.

Speaking at a news conference near the G20 Summit site, the presidents of the Canadian Labour Congress and the Ontario Federation of Labour outlined their reasons for organizing the large protest while assuring people it will be both peaceful and safe. Joining them was the Canadian Civil Liberties Association which, along with the CLC, has sought a court order to prevent the unsafe use of sonic cannons during the protest to guarantee a safe environment for people who choose to express themselves outside of the high security zone.

"Canadians have a right to freely express themselves in the public places of their own community and their own country. We've been working for months with local organizations here in Toronto, including local police to provide people with a safe and peaceful venue to express their displeasure with G20 leaders and their own government," said OFL president Sid Ryan.

Rally organizers say they are aware of over thirty buses that have been chartered by local labour unions and student associations to bring people from across Ontario to the protests. They also report that people who want to come and raise their issues are being intimidated by the excessive security presence and news stories that show police in full riot gear, flaunting weapons used against attacking pirates on the high seas. They've addressed those concerns by keeping their march away from security hot spots and by joining an appeal to the courts to prevent police from using their new sonic cannons, or LRADs.

"These weapons haven't been tested or approved for use in Ontario. Until then, we have no guarantee that police know how to use them properly and safely," said Nathalie Des Rosiers of the CCLA, which sought the court injunction this week with the support of rally organizers. "These laws exist for our protection; they cannot be put aside simply because foreign dignitaries are coming to town."

CLC president Ken Georgetti says the main reason for staging a protest rally, as well as a march through the streets of Toronto during the G20 Summit is to draw attention to the way working people are getting left behind and left out of the economic recovery.

“Working people need to come out, speak up and tell their leaders that we refuse to get stuck with all the bills for a financial crisis and a recession that we did not cause. Reckless financial traders and greedy investment bankers caused it. People lost millions of jobs and billions in savings. Governments went deep into debt to provide help – and now they want us to pay with higher taxes and belt-tightening and let those bankers off the hook,” said CLC president Ken Georgetti.

“Those greedy CEOs need to take responsibility for the damage that was done and pay their fair share, starting with a tax on financial transactions. Governments need that revenue to continue helping the jobs market recover and to get back to work on vital issues like climate change, HIV-AIDS, and the crushing poverty we see in the world today,” said Georgetti.

The “People First!” Rally and March take place on Saturday, June 26, starting at 1:00 p.m. on the south lawn of Queen's Park and then march south on University Avenue, turning west along Queen Street West, then north onto Spadina Avenue, and finally east onto College Street back to a main stage for more music and local entertainment.



Related Web Sites:
http://www.canadianlabour.ca
G20 Protest Route


For More Information:
Patrick (Sid) Ryan, President
p: 416.441.2731 m: 416.209.0066 f: 416.441.0722
Toll-free: 1-800-668-9138

Pam Frache, Education Director
p: 416-443-7663 f: 416.441.0722
Jeff Atkinson
CLC Communications
e: jatkinson@clc-ctc.ca p: 613.863.1413

Monday, June 21, 2010


CANADIAN POLITICS - ONTARIO:
HELP SAVE 'STREET HEALTH':



Street Health is a community outreach organization in Toronto which serves a mainly poor clientelle. Recent moves have placed the accessibility of this service in doubt due to the closing of the most convemient location for 'street people' to access. The Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP) has been organizing for a long time to try and block the destruction of this program, and now they are calling for people to attend the Genreal Meeting of Street Health tomorrow to continue the fight. If you liove in the Toronto area consider coming out to lend a hand. Here's the appeal.
TOTOTOTOTOTOTO


COME OUT TOMORROW:
Fighting for the Heart of Street Health‏
Come out tomorrow, Tuesday June 22 - 6 PM!
Fighting for the Heart of Street Health
-Holding the Board of Street Health Accountable to the Community
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tomorrow, Tuesday June 22, Street Health is holding its Annual General Meeting. Laura Cowan, the Executive Director,and Eleanor Lester, chair of the Board of Directors, steadfastly refuse to meet with community members to discuss the removal of the PAID administrative office at Street Health which was removed last December. They are also refusing to address concerns that Street Health is now being taken over by high-paid corporate consultants.

We invite everyone who cares about Street Health to attend this Annual General Meeting tomorrow and demand that the Street Health Board and E.D. finally address these concerns and return Street Health back to the community!

Meet in front of Street Health, 388 Dundas Street East (just East of Sherbourne & Dundas Street East) at 6 PM.


LOCAL EVENTS WINNIPEG:
BOOK SIGNING OF 'MOSAIC VILLAGE', A HISTORY OF WINNIPEG'S NORTH END:




Coming up this Thursday at Pollock's Hardware Co-op 1407 Main St., Winnipeg MB...meet the author of 'Mosaic Village'. Celebrate the North End's history at the local cooperative alternative to the big box stores.
WWWWWWWWWW


Mosaic Village book signing w/author Russ Gourluck‏


Hi everyone
We have an upcoming event here at Pollock'sRuss Gourluck well known Winnipeg author will be signing copies of his new book " The Mosaic Village " an illustrated history of Winnipeg's North End.
Time : Thursday June 24 @ 7:00pm here at the store
We will have lots of copies available price is 29.95 plus taxes.
Hope to see you!

Sunday, June 20, 2010


INTERNATIONAL LABOUR- CHINA:
A NEW WAY TO ORGANIZE:


The communist/capitalist rulers of the Peoples' Republic of China have recently been challenged by a grass roots movement of striking workers at Honda manufacturing plants. Fearful of the spread of this workers' rebellion, outside of the official Communist Party unions, the government has actually conceded to the workers' demands. the reason for this is detailed below. The workers have managed to go beyond the official trade unions and coordinate their actions via the internet. It's an interesting though. Personally I have always favoured established radical anarchosyndicalist unions whatever their disadvantages. In some situations, however, where it is impossible to maintain alternative unions it is still possible given modern technology for a mass movement to grow, as it has in China. Here's the story from the New York Times.

CCCCCCCCCC
In China, Labor Movement Enabled by Technology
By DAVID BARBOZA and KEITH BRADSHER

The 1,700 workers who went on strike at the Honda Lock auto parts factory here are mostly poor migrants with middle-school educations.

But they are surprisingly tech-savvy.

Hours into a strike that began last week, they started posting detailed accounts of the walkout online, spreading word not only among themselves but also to restive and striking workers elsewhere in China.

They fired off cellphone text messages urging colleagues to resist pressure from factory bosses. They logged onto a state-controlled Web site — workercn.cn — that is emerging as a digital hub of the Chinese labor movement. And armed with desktop computers, they uploaded video of Honda Lock’s security guards roughing up employees.

“We videotaped the strike with our cellphones and decided to post the video online to let other people know how unfairly we were treated,” said a 20-year-old Honda employee who asked not to be named because of the threat of retaliation.

The disgruntled workers in this southern Chinese city took their cues from earlier groups of Web-literate strikers at other Honda factories, who in mid-May set up Internet forums and made online bulletin board postings about their own battle with the Japanese automaker over wages and working conditions.

But they have also tapped into a broader communications web enabling the working class throughout China to share grievances and strategies. Some strike leaders now say they spend much of their time perusing the Web for material on China’s labor laws.

Wielding cellphones and keyboards, members of China’s emerging labor movement so far seem to be outwitting official censors in an effort to build broad support for what they say is a war against greedy corporations and their local government allies.

And it might not be possible if the Chinese government had not made a concerted effort in the last decade to shrink the country’s digital divide by lowering the cost of mobile phone and Internet service in this country — a modernization campaign that has given China the world’s biggest Internet population (400 million) and allowed even the poorest of the poor to log onto the Internet and air their labor grievances.

“This is something people haven’t paid attention to — migrant workers can organize using these technologies,” said Guobin Yang, a professor at Barnard College and author of “The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online.”

“Usually we think of this kind of thing being used by middle-class youths and intellectuals,” Professor Yang said.

The Web and digital devices, analysts say, have become vehicles of social change in much the way the typewriter and mimeograph machine were the preferred media during the pro-democracy protests in Beijing in 1989 — before the government put down that movement in the June 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown that left hundreds dead.

A looming question now, in fact, is whether and when the government might seek to quash the current worker uprisings if they become too big a threat to the established social order. Already, the government has started cracking down on strike-related Web sites and deleted many of the blog posts about the strikes.

The instant messaging service QQ, which is accessible via the Web or mobile phone — and was perhaps the early favorite network of strike leaders because of its popularity among young people — was soon infiltrated by Honda Lock officials and government security agents, forcing some to move to alternative sites, strike leaders say.

“We’re not using QQ any more,” said one strike leader here. “There were company spies that got in. So now we’re using cellphones more.”

Analysts say they were smart to change.

“QQ offers no protection from eavesdropping by the Chinese authorities, and it is just as well they stopped using it,” said Rebecca MacKinnon, a China specialist and fellow at the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton University. “QQ is not secure. You might as well be sharing your information with the Public Security Bureau.”

But the activists say they are getting around some of those restraints by shifting to different platforms (including a Skype-like network called YY Voice) and using code words to discuss protest gatherings.

For years, labor activists have been exposing the harsh working conditions in Chinese factories by smuggling cellphone images and video out of coastal factories and posting documents showing labor law violations on the Web. New and notable is that these formerly covert activities have become open and pervasive.

Last month, for example, when a string of puzzling suicides was reported at Foxconn Technology near here, one of the world’s largest electronics manufacturers, there were online video postings reportedly showing security guards manhandling workers.

CANADIAN POLITICS-ONTARIO:
FIGHTING THE G8/G20:




Everything is in its proper place for the upcoming G8/G20 photo-op in Toronto except that the federal government has yet to spend all of its over 1 billion dollars on security. No doubt given the fact that everybody and his dog is hoping to profit from this the eventual bill will be far larger.




The police will be testing out their latest riot control technology even though from my point of view they hardly need it. Since the legendary (in anarchist circles) Seattle summit the police have "won" every single time. Maybe the testing is merely how to win even more overwhelmingly ? Meanwhile the "anarchists" will be playing their usual role of trying to outsmart the police, totally oblivious to the fact that their petty victories or defeats in these summit circuses have exactly zero effect (hopefully not negative) on the great 99.99999 % who would never dream of participating in such a thing.


The 'Great Wall of Toronto's' construction is pretty well completed by now. Speaking of "trial runs" the only beneficiary of what the government is now planning would be the government itself. If my "comrades" intend to play their anointed role vis-a-vis the mass media they will accomplish nothing other than proving that the budget of the security police in Canada must be increased.


So incredibly sad, at least for me. While I may be greatly inspired by the massive growth of anarchism across the world in the last few decades here in North America I see that the anarchist "movement" is well and thoroughly trapped in repetitive behavior and an actual misunderstanding of what such anarchist terms as "direct action" actually means. Nowadays it has become a synonym for "symbolic action" that is militant and violent enough to satisfy some people's delusions of their own importance in the scheme of things. Language indeed changes over time.


Here's a callout from the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP) to participate in the upcoming protests, along with a previous protest. Think about it, but also don't expect too much from it, at least in terms of some "global protest against capitalism" that might actually accomplish something.
CPCPCPCPCPCPCP
Justice For Our Communities! NO TO G8/G20! + Their Crisis, Our Misery: OCAP Versus the G20‏

Please also read 'Their Crisis, Our Misery: OCAP Versus the G20' at bottom ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Toronto's Community Organizations invite you to fight back against the fear mongering of Harper' billion dollar security fiasco and march in a massive demonstration on June 25th. Harper and global financial institutions are vulnerable to the power of communities rising up and reclaiming space - building the kind of worlds we wish to live in. Join Us for a Tent City that highlights homelessness and migration and creates the safe, accessible, just communities we need.


JUSTICE FOR OUR COMMUNITIES!

NO TO G8/G20! YES TO TAKING BACK OUR CITY!

Friday, June 25th, 2010At 2:30pm
Allan Gardens (Carleton St. and Sherbourne St)

RALLY. MARCH. BLOCK PARTY. TENT CITY

March will be led by Women and Transfolk - http://wp.me/pVzSF-I
ASL interpretation available at rally and march. Wheelchair accessible bus departs 2pm from Yonge and Dundas.
Buses also leaving from across Toronto: http://wp.me/sVzSF-buses .
March is followed by AMAZING Block Party. Check out the talent: http://wp.me/pVzSF-C


From June 25th and 27th, 2010, the world's twenty richest countries (the G8 and G20) will send their ruling elite, along with heads of the IMF and World Bank, to meet in Huntsville and then in Toronto, to talk exploitation, wealth, and greed.


These ˜leaders" have shredded the public sector and social spending, criminalized the poor, immigrants and racialized communities, continued to plunder Indigenous lands and trash the environment, deported our families and friends, gutted the unions, and closed hospitals and schools while they grant tax cuts to the rich and corporations and boost police and military budgets. These disgusting policies have enacted devastation around the world and are reflected right here in Toronto.


We are the people severely impacted by this agenda: we are Toronto-based community organizations, people of color, indigenous people, immigrants, women, the poor, the working class, queer and trans people, disabled people, and our allies. We live in a city that houses the corporations that exploit and displace people. The Toronto police kills and brutalizes our communities. Toronto housing kicks out our families. Toronto social services slam the door on undocumented migrants. This city pushes out poor people and attacks sex workers. Toronto exists on stolen indigenous land. Toronto's communities are uniting to take back what is ours!


Join us on the streets June 25, as we ensure the G20, the G8 and their deadly policies are exposed and challenged! Rally, march, party and pitch a tent city against Toronto and the G8/G20's colonial, racist, sexist, abeliest, homo/transphobic and capitalist policies. Join Us for Justice For Our Communities!


Action expected to continue until next day. Bring sleeping bags and/or join when you can! Constant updates on June 25th at http://25june.wordpress.com/
and on twitter @g20mobilize


Supported by: Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, No One Is Illegal-Toronto, LIFE Movement, Jane and Finch Action Against Poverty, Students Against Israeli Apartheid, DAMN 2025, Women's Coordinating Committee Chile “ Canada, No Games Toronto, South Asian Women's Rights Organization, Ryerson Students Union, International Federation of Iranian Refugees in Canada, Gender Justice for All, Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid, Not in Our Name (NION): Jewish Voices Opposing Zionism, Gaza Freedom March, Educators for Peace and Justice, Women in Solidarity with Palestine, ShelterSanctuaryStatus, Greater Toronto Workers Assembly, Health for All

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Their Crisis, Our Misery:
OCAP Versus the G20
Liisa Schofield and A.J. Withers
On June 26th, the G20 meetings will bring together the leaders of the world's richest 20 states in Toronto, following right on meetings of the G8 in Huntsville, in Northern Ontario. The G20 wants to talk about stabilizing the global economy and Harper wants to celebrate Canada as an economic success story. However, poor communities show the reality of what that ‘success’ has meant: during the economic crisis, the government has detained and deported more migrants, and their policies have meant more evictions, more unemployment, and more poverty.


While the rich may celebrate their success in managing the crisis, this ‘success’ has been paid for by poor people in Canada. It is because the poor are paying for the economic crisis that the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP) is mobilizing our communities against the G20 meetings. With allied community organizations, we will be rallying on June 25th at 2:30pm in Allan Gardens, marching through the streets of Toronto and setting up a Tent City.


As the Business Summit meets and on the eve of the G20 Summit, we will be bringing the demands of our communities and the anger at the conditions that people are forced to live in every single day to the G20 circus. We ask you to join us.
The G20 and Capitalism


The G20 represents the global economic system of capitalism. Specifically, the G20 celebrates the neoliberal model that has surfaced and spread in the last thirty years. Neoliberal policies are reflected in Federal, Provincial and Municipal governments in Canada, and the decisions that they make today. Like other parts of the world, in Canada we have seen a shift toward for-profit models of housing, healthcare, and social services. For twenty years, one government after another has gutted the gains that people fought for and won – such as social assistance, unemployment benefits, healthcare, and childcare.


For example, when it comes to Ontario Welfare (OW) and the Ontario Disability Support Program(ODSP) rates, we are faced with disgustingly low social assistance payments that people are forced to try to survive on. This is due, in large measure, to the cuts by the Ontario Tory government of Mike Harris in the 1990s, combining huge tax breaks for the rich and devastating cuts to social services for poor people. As a result, these policy changes involved a massive transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor.


For example, in Toronto, about $1-million a month shifted from the poor neighborhood of Regent Park to the rich neighborhood of Rosedale.

Tax the Banks

Harris's Tories represented the nastiest form of neoliberal capitalism. But the policies of the Harris government have, in fact, found support in all three major parties in Ontario, and have been continued by the Liberals in government. Indeed, since 2003, this same model of policies has been moved forward by the Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty.


Under McGuinty, only lip service has been paid to reversing the Harris cuts. In fact, poor people today are worse off than they were in 1995 as the Liberals have allowed the steady erosion of income supports for the poor. Today, social assistance rates are 55 per cent below where they were prior to Harris' cuts. The base amount for a single person on welfare in Ontario is a shameful $585/month. It is clear that the role of welfare in today's economy is to push people toward low wage work and to drive down wages for all workers. One in six workers lives on a ‘poverty wage,’ meaning they earn minimum wage or within $1 of the minimum wage.


Wages are typically far worse for non-status workers – most of whom don't have access to welfare and are commonly paid under the table at less than the minimum wage. Bailouts and Austerity Measures At the same time as they put the squeeze on poor families, the G20 leaders have paid massive bailouts to large corporations to deal with the recent capitalist crisis. Now, to pay for these bailouts, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) (an international financial institution that plays a key role in co-ordinating the policies of members of the G20) is recommending 20 years of austerity measures.


In doing so, the IMF and G20 countries are arguing that the vicious cuts to housing, welfare, education and healthcare that occurred in Canada in the 1990s should be a model for the world! Austerity measures involve cuts to public spending that fall disproportionately on the poor and the most marginalized. They increase poverty, hit hardest by women, people of colour, First Nations people and disabled people.


Two current examples in Ontario illustrate the negative impact of austerity on social inequalities and public services. In Ontario, austerity measures in the recent Provincial budget led to the cut of the Special Diet benefit for welfare recipients. This $200-million program gave people on welfare and disability up to an extra $250 a month on their cheques. The Special Diet is the last thing that people on social assistance have left to try to pay the rent and put food on the table when the rates are as despicably low as they are. People who have fought for access to this benefit have been dragged through the mud, and baselessly called ‘frauds’ and ‘cheats’ by the Province.


Similarly, austerity measures are adding to the ongoing cuts to public transit funds in Toronto. One of the first things to be cut was physical accessibility. Rather than make the transit system wheelchair accessible by 2015, as had previously been promised, the city now says it will take another 10 years (which curiously corresponds with the date prescribed by provincial accessibility legislation that will come into effect in 2025). At the same time, Toronto Transit Commission fares have risen, making the system even less accessible. Because of these austerity measures,Toronto's public transit is increasingly less of a public good or more and more just another commercialized commodity as riders pay 70 per cent of the cost of transit directly, the highest in North America.


The consequence of neglect and perpetual austerity is the worst traffic gridlock in North America, and increasingly one of the least accessible transit systems for poor people.
Refusing to Tax the Rich
One proposal that has been floated by some G20 countries is a ‘financial transaction tax’ (FTT) that would tax transactions on stock, derivative and currency trading. This tax is at extremely low levels, would hardly disrupt financialization, and would completely fail to deal with income inequalities. Yet, as it would specifically target financial institutions and corporations (and the wealthy that control them), the very people who caused the financial crisis in the first place.


The Federal government of Stephen Harper is against the tax, with the support of the provincial governments in Canada. At the same time, the governments of Canada and Ontario have been shifting the proportion of taxes which fall on workers, while cutting progressive income taxes and corporate taxes. Such changes in how taxation is distributed disproportionately affect the working classes and, more specifically the poor.


Within Canada, Treaty Rights are still being violated and land claims remain unsettled. Yet, the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) was set to eliminate he point of sale exemptions for First Nations people, a direct violation of treaty rights. First Nations people are also among the poorest in the country, a legacy of centuries of racist colonial policy, which unilateral changes in tax policy continue to reflect. Only 10 days before the G8 meetings and under threat First Nations people would “shut down the country” did the Federal government announce that it would continue the point of sale exemption for First Nations people.


The rejection of the FTT, and the continuance of tax cuts and tax shifting onto the poor and working people in Canada, are perfect examples of how neoliberal policies continue to set the agenda of current fiscal policies in Canada. The austerity policies that the G20 will end up calling for at its meetings in Toronto are likely to follow the pattern of the ‘Canadian model,’ and operate to benefit the rich at the direct expense of the poor.

Attacking the Poor

Perhaps the most immediate and despicable attack on the poor by the G20 is occurring as part of the Summit preparations: the clearing of the streets in Toronto of people considered to be ‘undesirable,’ five minutes away from where the G20 Summit is taking place at Front Street around the CN Tower, the Skydome and the Convention Centre, there is one of the highest concentrations of homeless people in Canada at Dundas Street East andSherbourne Street. City police have begun to clear the streets of homeless people leading up to the Summit. The spokesperson for Toronto police, Meaghan Gray,confirmed that: “Those who do not move will be escorted out by police and shelter officials.”


This forcibly removes people from the streets that they have every right to be on, and that is in fact their everyday residence. Moreover, a significant problem is created in that the shelter system has been gutted by the long-term impact of budgetary cuts for housing provisions for the poor. There are few, if any, housing spaces left. So, where will they take people – to the mega-jails that is one of the few areas where Canadian governments are expanding their funding? To the new ‘temporary’ detention centres that are being built for G20 security? Toronto's homeless population is exploding because of the lack of jobs, because welfare and disability rates are so low, because this government refuses to build affordable housing, and because there are no services for migrants (the fastest growing population on the streets).


In order to help promote the mythology of Canada's economic model of ‘success,’ any visible signs of poverty such as panhandlers, squeegee workers, and homeless people will be removed. The G20 delegates will not have to be confronted with the ways their plans and policies for perpetual austerity will create intense and growing poverty. To socially cleanse our neighborhoods and to police G8 and G20 protesters, the Canadian government is spending over $900-million on security, and over $1.2-billion on the Summits.


That sums up neoliberal capitalism and the so-called exit strategy from the financial crisis: plans for government cuts and austerity, on the one hand, and socialization of bankers’ losses and massive spending for social cleansing and policing, on the other.

Where Could that Money have Gone?

The money that is available for Summit policing, but is apparently not available for the poor, could have been better used:

* The money spent on the Summit could house everyone who is currently homeless in Toronto plus everyone on the waiting list for community housing – a total of 80,000 people – for over a year in one bedroom apartments at the average rent.
* The money spent on the Summit could pay for five years of the Ontario Special Diet Program as it is being accessed right now. It could pay for every person on ODSP to get the full $250 a month for the next ten years.

* The money spent on the Summit could buy a Metropass for public transit for every person in Toronto on welfare for about ten years. When the governments of Canada choose to spend more than $1-billion on a conference instead of housing, food, or transportation, they send a message that is loud and clear about where their priorities lie.


The Federal and Provincial governments are all gutting the money needed by women's groups, First Nations peoples, immigrants, public transit, social assistance and healthcare. These same governments are increasing taxes for poor people but cutting corporate taxes. These same governments are spending enormous sums on the global circus that is the G8 and G20 Summits. The only way this will ever change is with the organized resistance of poor, working class, and marginalized people here and around the world. In many parts of the world, similar austerity measures are being bravely fought by poor people and public sector workers, as in the public sector strikes in Greece.


We are protesting in Toronto and Canada not only the ridiculous expenses of the G8/G20 Summits, but, more importantly, the very existence of the G8/G20 as forums for the most powerful capitalist states, and the rich elites they support and protect, to pursue their own private agendas. We protest the fact that the leaders of the richest and most powerful countries, the people who cause wars, poverty and devastation across the planet, come together to discuss how to further concentrate power in their hands. And in the case of these Summits, agree on plans for austerity that will protect and enhance the financial industries while having the poor pay for the very financial crisis they caused.


We are not protesting the G20 because it is coming to Toronto. We are protesting the G20 because it represents capitalism, and the worst features of its brand of neoliberal capitalism that has been in Toronto and Canada, hurting our communities, for years. We are protesting as a part of a global anti-capitalist movement for social justice and global solidarity. We fight the G20 in this spirit, not only to register our dissent. We fight to win; we will fight until we win; and we will win. •

Friday, June 18, 2010


INTERNATIONAL LABOUR- GERMANY
FAU WINS COURT VICTORY:



Molly has mentioned the case of the Freie Arbeiterinnen und Arbeiter Union (Free Workers' Union - the FAU) of Germany before on this blog. The basic dispute began via the management of Babylon Cinema in Berlin using legal manouvres to prevent the FAU who represented workers there from being defined as a union. The latest decision of the courts is that the FAU is indeed a union. This represents a great victory for anarchosyndicalism in Germany. the following article is from the Anarkismo website. Molly first became awared of this victory via the local Winnipeg Wobbly Blog who published their own article on this a few days ago.

@@@@@@@@@@
Deal With It! The FAU Berlin Can Call Itself a Union

About 50 people gathered in the biggest hall of Berlin's Higher Court on the morning of June 10th. They were waiting for the decision on the FAU Berlin's appeal on whether they could call themselves a union. Only 15 minutes into the trial, the judge delivered the verdict. The injunction is overturned; the ban is repealed; the crowd goes wild.





The court emphasized how weak the plaintiff's arguments were. The Babylon Mitte cinema management, where the employees and the FAU have been waging an effective labor struggle since last year, insisted on their point of view: The FAU Berlin is only aloud to call itself a union, if it has proven it has the capacity to conclude collective agreements. This refers to Berlin's Labor Court decision to grant an injunction to Babylon's management banning a boycott call made by the FAU Berlin. That judge justified his decision by saying the FAU Berlin isn't what case law traditionally considers a union with the capacity to conclude collective agreements. Only such union are legally allowed to take job action, i.e. call for boycotts.

Using the exact same argument, the plaintiff was able to get the FAU Berlin banned from calling itself a union in Berlin's Lower Court. This was not only a nuisance that led to an expensive run through the courts, it was also a hindrance to the union's work. Being a union comes with certain rights, which the FAU Berlin could no longer make use of. Not only in the cinema but in all labor disputes its members are involved in.

Berlin's Higher Court says that there is no actual, objective criteria for the right to use the term union. If the plaintiff puts the capacity to conclude collective agreements into play, this is their personal interpretation of the law. And anyway, in light of freedom of speech, anyone can call themselves what they want. Furthermore, the cause of the injunction was not deemed proven. The cinema management, who had refused to negotiate with the FAU, had claimed that it was financially harmed because the FAU had said it is a union. According to the court this was too constructed to justify an injunction.

Sekt Bottles Pop

After the court case, there was a manifestation in front of the courthouse. Hector Feliciano of the Spanish CNT-IWA and André Eisenstein of the French CNT, who both attended as trial observers, congratulated the FAU Berlin on their judicial victory. "A union is more than a piece of paper; it exists in our hearts, heads, and our actions," said Laure Akai of the Polish ZSP-IWA to the gathering. Klaus Stähle, the lawyer who had defended the FAU in this case, made clear what the court meant with its ruling: "The Babylon Cinema has to live with the fact that you are a union!" The crowd then moved on to a spontaneously demonstration—this time in front of the cinema. Chants like "FAU-IWA, the union, is here to stay" were chanted through the window of Babylon Manager Timothy Grossman.

June 10th was a great day for workers' rights. The "Emmily" case was also heard by the Federal Lab our Court. Both the Emmily committee and the FAU held a demonstration together in front of a Kaiser's supermarket. The labor activist, Emmily, had worked in Kaiser's before being fired after her boss claimed she had stolen a bottle deposit coupon worth 1.30 Euro. She won her trial as well. Two reasons to celebrate for both groups, who had supported each other in the runup to the trials.

In the evening, the international guests came together in the FAU's offices where there was a panel discussion related to union work. The overall premise was that the different countries have had different histories, but in reaction to the financial crisis all of the governments have plans relating to cutting labor rights in reserve. It could be seen that in every country--to a different extent and in different ways--centralize unions are favored for their role as guardians of the establishment. At the same time small militant unions have had their rights curtailed. The duty of the syndicalist movement in Europe has to be to counteract this and to strengthen the rights of workers.


Movement within union structures.


This ruling's meaning goes beyond the cinema. Germany has very fixed union structures and the centralized union wants to see its monopoly expanded. There is no room for self-organized, grassroots groups here. Whoever wants to change this situation will face serious headwind. That's why the de-facto ban on the FAU Berlin was a serious precedence, which was an attack on union freedoms in general.

The day also saw international protests. In Philadelphia and Amsterdam, there were simultaneous pickets targeting German consuls. A few days earlier, Lithuanian union member demonstrated in front of the Germany Embassy in Vilnius. Demonstrators could be heard chanting: "The ban is an attack on workers in Germany and we won't let it stand." "This is how capitalist try to break the labor movement's back." Letters of solidarity were received by the FAU over the last weeks from countries around the world.

For the FAU Berlin, the ruling means that a long period of intense activity is coming to an end. They are very delighted about all the support they have gotten--for example, from the Solidarity Committee which gathered countless signatures contesting the de-facto ban. Financial support through donations was also an important factor. As opposed to the government-funded cinema, which lets its court costs be paid by tax dollars, the FAU does not receive any support from the government. The many letters, protest actions, and manifestations that occurred both nationally and internationally, were a decisive factor in this struggle.

The injunction banning the FAU Berlin from calling for a boycott of the cinema was not rescinded. As long as the question of the FAU Berlin's capacity to conclude collective agreements has not been clarified, it will be difficult for the FAU local in the cinema to make good their demands. Lars Röhm, secretary of the FAU Berlin: "We can now call ourselves a union again, but we'll still have to fight for the rights other unions take for granted."

The FAU Berlin will have ample opportunity to do this--their membership has been growing steadily. A handful of locals are in the process of forming in different industries from health care to sanitary. And there's even another cinema.


Related Link: http://www.fau.org/verbot/en/art_100613-005351
HUMOUR:
THE WORLD CUP- THE AFTERMATH:

Thursday, June 17, 2010


HUMOUR:
OIL SPILL CUISINE

LOCAL EVENTS - CANADIAN POLITICS:
TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION HEARINGS BEGIN:




Appropriately enough the public events for Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission have begun here in Winnipeg, the aboriginal capital of Canada and perhaps of all of North America polar to the Rio Grand. Winnipeg's native population numbers about 68,380 according to Stats Can as of 2007. This is probably an slight underestimate, but it still places the aboriginal population as about 10% of the city. Having lived here for over a quarter of a century I think this is about the right percentage. This is greater in absolute numbers than many other larger cities such as Vancouver and Edmonton which also have substantial numbers of aboriginal people. There are smaller centres such as North Battleford (18%) and Prince Albert (about 33%), both in Saskatchewan where the percentage of aboriginals is greater than that of Winnipeg, but Winnipeg amongst so-called 'major cities' holds pride of place as the city where the "native fact" is the greatest even though the native presence in western Canada is much more obvious generally.




The events of the first hearing of the T&RC at the Forks here in Winnipeg have drawn large crowds despite weather that has been less than clement to say the least. They have garnered extensive press coverage locally and even nationally. For those interested in general news coverage I suggest that they go to the websites of the Winnipeg Free Press and the Winnipeg Sun. For myself I would like to explore, at least briefly, some of the issues behind these events and compare and contrast them to the situation in other countries. I do this with full understanding that I may make grievous mistakes in describing the situation outside of Canada, and I hope that readers from any country mentioned will see fit to correct me if I make too egregious an error.




To begin with the very title of the event seems to be borrowed from the South African context and their own 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission'. The way in which these two settler societies dealt with their indigenous populations were dramatically different, but the 'Canadian way' was similar if not identical to that which took place in the USA and Australia. In South Africa the Boer ruling class essentially "gave up" on the idea of assimilation of what was, after all, the vast majority of the country's population, and even if they constructed their apartheid state by imitation of the Canadian, American and Australian reservation system they never made serious attempts at cultural genocide. In CAA (Canada, America, Australia) various 'do-gooders' took upon themselves the task of "civilizing" the native population ie abolishing them as an identifiable group. To my understanding in Australia this effort was mainly directed towards what they called "half-castes" there ('half breeds' in Canada) while hoping that the aboriginals out in their reserves would gradually become extinct.




The South African commissions are also markedly different from those now being held in Canada in that they are being held in the context of the victory on the part of the majority of the population relatively recently after a successful armed (partially) struggle. They are almost exclusively concerned with events of the last few decades while the Canadian hearings will be concerned with events that extend back to the 1800s and which concern a minority of the population whose armed struggles were defeated in the 19th century. The interesting, and perhaps controversial thing to those outside of Canada (and even to many Canadians), is that the 'death toll' of Canada's residential schools is probably far greater than that of the armed struggle in South Africa, and most of the dead were innocent children on the 'losing side'. YES, the death toll from the Canadian system exceeds by a large number what might actually be termed as "war", and all the victims were innocents.

So how to view the present hearings ? There are similarities between the native experience and that of all of us who endured Catholic schools even if we weren't native. The methods of "discipline" that many people endured (I include myself here) have shown up documented as military torture methods in later years. One might be tempted to view the 'native case' as special pleading, a view that is held by many in Canada. On the other hand those of us who endured the religious school system had certain advantages over the native children. First of all we were not kidnapped and flown to a prison where the jailers spoke a foreign language and insisted that we speak in within days of arrival. Whatever the brutality that we were subjected to which was little different from that that native children endured we at least went home at the end of the day and there was no opportunity for murder. Murder !! That is the only way that many of the things that happened in residential schools could be described.



According to a reference on the Wikipedia site on the Indian Residential Schools it was noted as early as 1909 that the death rate in these schools varied from 35% to 60%. As time went on this rate declined, but it was still horrendous in the 20th century until the schools were finally closed. A lot of this was because the conditions in the schools were very much optimum for the transmission of infectious disease. Group housing in dormitories where the space between beds was two feet for instance. In his 1909 report and in his subsequent book Dr. Peter Bryce claimed that such a situation was actually deliberate. Personally I doubt this given my knowledge of the Roman Catholic Church where brutality is an accepted method but extermination is to be avoided. One dead child equals one less proselytizer in the future. Ignorance and sadism (things that I noted were almost universal amongst Catholic clerics that I had the misfortune of coming in contact with in my childhood ) are totally adequate explanations, and 'conspiracy' does not have to be invoked.



So how to view the present hearings. There are some such as Kevin D. Arnett whose writings are reproduced at the Porkupine Blog who view these hearings entirely negatively. What Kevin sees in these hearings is an "opportunity" to absolve the guilty, and what he says has a certain validity. YES, one of the purposes of such hearings is definitely to "put the issue to rest". On the other hand the hearings will give victims the only opportunity that they will ever have to present what actually happened to the general Canadian public. All that I can say here is that the actual guilty individual parties are mostly dead by now, and that the presentation is much more important than a futile attempt to bring the guilty to justice. YES, this includes the guilty Church organizations. Their liability has been pretty much settled by now.



What I consider important in these hearings is that the full evil of what was done to native children be thoroughly exposed to the general public, and I think that these hearings are a good forum to do that. This exposure can have great positive benefits in the long term as Canada tries to come to terms with its native peoples, and it can promote proper public understanding of the best ways to deal with this legacy. YES, nothing will immediately result from the hearings, but they present an opportunity to change views that will have long term consequences.
As a conclusion to this sad tale everybody should note that the designers and the operators of the residential school system were firmly convinced beyond tha shadow of a doubt that they were "doing good". This sort of result should serve as a cautionary reminder to reformers and revolutionaries of all sorts of the inevitable 'law of unintended consequences' that plagues all human action.
Here are a few references for those who are interested in this issue:


1)Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada http://www.trc.ca/ The official site centred here in Winnipeg.
2)Indian Residential School Survivors http://irss,ca/
3)National Residential School Survivors Society http://www.nrss.ca/
4)Assembly of First nations History of Residential Schools http://www.afn.ca/residentialschools/hiostory.html
5)CBC History of the Residential Schools http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/05/16
6)Wikipedia History of the Residential Schools http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian-Indian-residential-school-system

WEIRD STUFF:
INSTANT SONS- JUST ADD MILK:


The following from the Care2 site is way off the beaten path. I mean it, way off the beaten path. I present it here as a cautionary example of why clerics of all persuasions should never be allowed even the slightest tiny morsel of political power. There are those amongst the religious right in North America who harbour schemes that are just as strange when viewed from the outside. Anyways, for all you connoisseurs of human irrationality here's the article.
WWWWWWWWWW

Saudi Clerics Advocate Breastfeeding Adult Men
posted by: Robin Marty 1 day ago


I haven't pulled any punches in the past discussing how bothered I am by the laws against women in Saudi Arabia. From ridiculous "guardianship" laws to burdensome rules on being in public with men, to arresting women who even have too much of a tan, it's no wonder the public is beginning to physically fight against the authority in the land.

Obviously, the religious authority knows it has a problem that must be dealt with. But is this really the answer?


Women in Saudi Arabia should give their breast milk to male colleagues and acquaintances in order to avoid breaking strict Islamic law forbidding mixing between the sexes, two powerful Saudi clerics have said. They are at odds, however, over precisely how the milk should be conveyed.

A fatwa issued recently about adult breast-feeding to establish "maternal relations" and preclude the possibility of sexual contact has resulted in a week's worth of newspaper headlines in Saudi Arabia. Some have found the debate so bizarre that they're calling for stricter regulations about how and when fatwas should be issued.

Sheikh Al Obeikan, an adviser to the royal court and consultant to the Ministry of Justice, set off a firestorm of controversy recently when he said on TV that women who come into regular contact with men who aren't related to them ought to give them their breast milk so they will be considered relatives.



One cleric claims simply pumping and having the men drink the milk is enough to create this familial bond. Another, however, does say that "men should suckle the breast milk directly from a woman's breast."

The logic behind the edict is an apparently common practice known as "breast milk siblings" where according to the article, if you provide 5 "fulfilling" breastmilk meals to a male child before the age of two, you and your female family members will not have to cover your faces in front of him later in life, something that is apparently common among nieces and nephews.

But, when translated into somehow trying to provide this connection to an adult, and use it as a loophole in order to allow women to be in the presence of men who are not blood relations, a lot of obvious problems jump to mind. The first, of course, is the assumption that every woman is lactating, when in fact the only candidates for this process would be married mothers with children under the age of two, the traditional cutoff point for breastfeeding in that country. Women aren't just wandering around with milk in their breasts all of the time, married or not, mothers or not. This would provide no outlet for any unmarried woman, who tend to suffer the most under these strict guardianship laws, nor for widows or the elderly.

The second problem is what is meant by "fulfilling" meals. A grown adult obviously would take much more to be "fulfilled" than an infant, or even a toddler, whose stomachs are smaller than an apple.

Third, even with this loophole available, clerics have decreed that it cannot be used with a driver. As women in Saudi Arabia are not allowed to have driver's licenses, no woman would be able to go anywhere outside walking distance without having a man drive her. If this breastfeeding loophole can't be used with someone who can drive them from place to place, they are still essentially trapped without a family member to accompany them, regardless.

Breastfeeding adult males in order to be allowed to be with someone of the opposite sex who is not a family member is no real solution to the issues of Sharia law. In fact, it actually exacerbates them, as it simply reinforces the idea that a woman sole purpose in existence is to extend and tend to the family unit. Women in the country deserve real freedom, not that which is only granted to them if they act as the "sustenance" of the family.

HUMOUR:
FIGURING IT ALL OUT FOR NATO VICTORY IN AFGHANISTAN:
PLEASE CLICK GRAPHIC FOR BETTER VIEWING.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010



INTERNATIONAL LABOUR- SPAIN:
CGT PROPOSES TOTAL GENERAL STRIKE:



As Molly mentioned earlier on this blog the turnout for the June 8 public sector general strike was generally considered poor despite the claims of the two major union federations, the CCOO and the UGT. This may have , at least partially, been because neither the CCOO nor the UGT had much real enthusiasm for the strike, and thus they were half hearted in their organization. It may also have been that a public sector only (one day) general strike was the wrong tactical decision, pitting non-public sector workers against the strikers. There may have been many other factors as well.

However that may be the anarchosyndicalist CGT estimated that it achieved an overall participation rate amongst its public service members of 50%, putting it far ahead of the rate achieved by the larger unions. The CGT has generally been estimated to represent about 10% of the Spanish workforce as measured by 'union elections' in the workplaces. Perhaps encouraged by this the CGT has ramped up its efforts to pressure the CCOO to call a real general strike earlier than the September 29 date that the CCOO has set forth in cooperation with the UGT.

The CGT has proposed a date of June 30, perhaps an unrealistically early date to organize such a thing but far better than waiting over three months by which times people are much more likely to have become resigned to the government's measures. Perhaps the best date would be somewhere in between. One might doubt that the UGT leaders have any honest disagreements with what the Zapatero government is proposing and that their opposition is pure showmanship. Any real general strike is from their point of view best put off as long as possible. The CCOO whose leadership is made up of Stalinists who kept their union positions even while the Spanish Communist Party was disintegrating are no doubt playing their own game, hoping to appear the "toughest" of the two major federations while also not having to accept responsibility for another failed strike like that of June 8.

Both unions are helped by the fact that while the so-called labour "reforms" have been passed by government decree they are still not law until they pass Parliament, This will be difficult and involve some compromise...the Socialists are 7 seats short of a majority, but there is little doubt that the measures will for the most part become law. All of this is in a context where it is likely that the EU and IMF are putting together contingency plans to bail out Spain should it go the way of Greece. Various European governments have been falling all over themselves declaring that there is no such plan (a sure sign that there is one ?) this week as borrowing costs for the Spanish government (a measure of investor confidence) have soared almost 45% in the course of a month.

The CGT's proposal, of course, has a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by the CCOO, let alone the UGT, and the CGT is far too small to try and carry out such a thing on their own. What they are probably doing, however, is playing for the long term, trying to position themselves as the real opposition as workers become disillusioned with the attitude of the UGT and CCOO, especially as the government's present measures are unlikely to be either the last or the worst of the attacks on social rights that are coming. for some time now it has been the policy of the CGT to call for an unlimited real general strike. This proposal to the CCOO should be seen as one move in their long term efforts. What follows is the CGT press release from their website.
@@@@@@@@@@
The General Confederation of Labour proposes to CCOO the convening of a general strike for June 30
(10/06/2010)


The General Confederation of Labour has today addressed a letter to Ignacio Fernandez Toxo, Secretary General of the CCOO, proposing the convening of a unified general strike for June 30.


With the economic crisis of recent years, which is hitting the workers so cruelly, it is combined with the latest measures taken by the Government to reduce the deficit by sharply attacking the public employees, pensioners and a set of social benefits and rights that are going to disappear dramatically. Now the Government announces a new labor reform by decree in a purely authoritarian style .

The CGT union views these measures announced in the new labor reform as extremely negative. The CGT also believes that they justify in themselves a forceful response by all Spanish trade unions.

The CGT going to put forth, as it has done in the recent public sector general strike , all its organizational capacity and commitment to make the general strike of June 30 a success.

The General Confederation of Labour believes that the working class and the public will not understand if the unions will not give at this time a rapid response to this serious attack which once more is against labor and social rights.

PERMANENT SECRETARIAT COMMITTEE OF THE CGT CONFEDERATION

HUMOUR:
THOUGHT OF THE DAY:

Tuesday, June 15, 2010


CANADIAN POLITICS:
SOLVING THE PENSION CRISIS:



Molly has mentioned the appeal from the CEP Union about Canada's pension system before on this blog. The recent finance ministers' meeting made vague promises to "reform" the system as whatever "gradual increases" mean, leaving potential things like rises in the CPP payroll tax up in the air. Here's another appeal, this time from the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) calling for real reform in Canada's pension system.
CPCPCPCPCPCPCP
Tell Stephen Harper: It's time to fix Canada's pension crisis
All Canadians should have the right to a secure income in their retirement through access to workplace and government-sponsored pension plans.

But 11 million Canadian workers have no workplace pension plan, and existing plans are under added stress because of the global economic meltdown.

Fortunately, we can fix this situation - by doubling the CPP to offer secure and enhanced pension benefits for the 93% of Canadians who make CPP contributions, by raising the guarantee income supplement to lift hundreds of thousands of poor pensioners out of poverty, and by introducing better regulations to protect pension plans from bankruptcy.

Tell Prime Minister Stephen Harper that there's an urgent need to solve the pension crisis in this country.
CPCPCPCPCPCPCP
THE LETTER:
Please go to this link to send the following letter to the Prime Minister.
CPCPCPCPCPCPCP

Dear Prime Minister:

All Canadians should have the right to a secure income in their retirement through access to workplace and government-sponsored pension plans.

There’s an urgent need for the federal government to solve the pension crisis in our country. I call on you to implement reforms proposed by the Canadian Union of Public Employees, including:
* Doubling Canada Pension Plan benefits to provide up to 50 per cent of the average wage;
* Working with unions and employers to ensure more Canadians are part of defined benefit pension plans and to protect the plans of workers already covered;
* Tougher laws to protect workers’ retirement income.

HUMOUR:
COMING SOON...TO A TAX OFFICE NEAR YOU, COURTESY OF THE HARPER GOVERNMENT:
Click on graphic for better viewing.