tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32250954.post6527965500078055330..comments2024-03-12T02:18:53.121-07:00Comments on Molly'sBlog: mollymewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10608757779720671118noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32250954.post-30748770470128094402009-09-06T23:40:00.184-07:002009-09-06T23:40:00.184-07:00It's an interesting question Slim. Mind if I m...It's an interesting question Slim. Mind if I make it one of the questions on Molly's Polls ? Truth to tell I never thought about such matters of definition very much. If you go with all three of the matters that you have mentioned above it seems, to me, to be far too restrictive. I can probably think of "anarchist films" that wouldn't fulfill ANY one of the criteria, except for a vague "anarchist theme", and I do mean VAGUE. Food for thought.mollymewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10608757779720671118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32250954.post-36398774831011338822009-09-06T07:49:54.364-07:002009-09-06T07:49:54.364-07:00The big question, which I'm going to post an e...The big question, which I'm going to post an essay in detail, is: what makes an "anarchist film"? is it one made by anarchists, one that has anarchist characters or one that has anarchist themes? And then, what are those themes?Transcona Slimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11129593925472199473noreply@blogger.com