tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32250954.post5570359964853294112..comments2024-03-12T02:18:53.121-07:00Comments on Molly'sBlog: mollymewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10608757779720671118noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32250954.post-2234855563211313422009-09-25T19:42:28.138-07:002009-09-25T19:42:28.138-07:00Please rant on. This is a free speech zone for any...Please rant on. This is a free speech zone for anything but corporate spam. I think you are right in your comments. In commenting on this strike I, personally have tried to use more neutral and inclusive words such as "premises" or "facilities". Quite frankly they obviously have never "sent a reporter to Sudbury", and I doubt that they ever will...until, of course, it becomes an even bigger story in Toronto. May it happen.mollymewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10608757779720671118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32250954.post-78323414551090660012009-09-25T06:23:01.938-07:002009-09-25T06:23:01.938-07:00The credibility of the media on this story is real...The credibility of the media on this story is really damaged by their continuous reference to the "strike at the Sudbury mine. The strike is at Vale Inco's Sudbury operations which includes numerous mines,a smelter, refinery and other processing operations. If they continuously report the story as being about a mine one would think they never even send reporters to Sudbury to cover the story. This is pretty consistent for all mainstream media reports.<br /><br />Sorry for ranting here but this has really been bugging me for awhile.rwwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00512582677240907287noreply@blogger.com